Use of huddles among frontline staff in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.

Clicks: 404
ID: 45456
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 36 articles by views in jbi database of systematic reviews and implementation reports

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This scoping review aims to provide an overview of current evidence on huddles in health care settings involving frontline staff.Team-based models are gaining prominence as the preferred method for delivering coordinated, cost-effective, high quality health care. Huddles are a powerful method for building relationships among frontline staff members. Currently, no reviews have described huddles used among frontline staff in clinical settings. There is therefore a need to identify gaps in the literature on evidence informing this practice for a greater understanding of the resources available for frontline staff to implement huddles.This scoping review will consider qualitative studies, experimental and quasi-experimental studies, analytic observational studies and descriptive cross-sectional studies that explore the use of frontline staff huddles to improve quality of care in a clinical setting.An initial limited search of PubMed and CINAHL Plus with Full Text will be performed, followed by analysis of the title, abstract text and MeSH used to describe the article. Second, searches of PubMed, EBSCOhost and ProQuest will be conducted, followed by searches in reference lists of all articles that meet the inclusion criteria. Studies published in English from inception to the present will be considered. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.
Reference Key
pimentel2019usejbi Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Pimentel, Camilla B;Hartmann, Christine W;Okyere, Daniel;Carnes, Sarah L;Loup, Julia R;Vallejo-Luces, Tatiana M;Sloup, Sharon N;Snow, A Lynn;
Journal jbi database of systematic reviews and implementation reports
Year 2019
DOI
10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00026
URL
Keywords
pharmacovigilance pharmacoepidemiology adverse drug reaction vietnam

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.