American journal of industrial medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2013 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

American journal of industrial medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Am J Ind Med
Abbreviated Name am j ind med
ISSN 1097-0274
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10970274
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2018
Unmanned aerial vehicles in construction and worker safety.
Howard, John;Murashov, Vladimir;Branche, Christine M;
Vol. 61 , No. 1 , pp. 3-10
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hired Latinx child farm labor in North Carolina: The demand-support-control model applied to a vulnerable worker population.
Quandt, Sara A;Arnold, Taylor J;Mora, Dana C;Sandberg, Joanne C;Daniel, Stephanie S;Arcury, Thomas A;
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparing disability and return to work outcomes between alternative and traditional workers' compensation programs.
Schofield, Katherine;Ryan, Andrew D;Dauner, Kim N;
Vol. 62 , No. 9 , pp. 755-765
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the impact of health and safety training: Increased behavioral change and organizational performance.
Ruttenberg, Ruth;Rice, Carol;
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dungeness crab commercial fishermen's perceptions of injuries inform survey development.
Kincl, Laurel;Nery, Mara;Syron, Laura N;Bovbjerg, Viktor;Jacobson, Kaety;
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 265-271
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Be careful!" Perceptions of work-safety culture among hired Latinx child farmworkers in North Carolina.
Arcury, Thomas A;Arnold, Taylor J;Mora, Dana C;Sandberg, Joanne C;Daniel, Stephanie S;Wiggins, Melinda F;Quandt, Sara A;
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Full employment history of Danish firefighters potentially involving additional exposures, 1964-2015.
Elbaek Pedersen, Julie;Ugelvig Petersen, Kajsa;Hansen, Johnni;
291 views DOI Abstract
2001
A case-control study of the relationship between the risk of colon cancer in men and exposures to occupational agents.
Goldberg, M S;Parent, M E;Siemiatycki, J;Désy, M;Nadon, L;Richardson, L;Lakhani, R;Latreille, B;Valois, M F;
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. 531-46
288 views Abstract
2007
A comparison of the perceptions and beliefs of workers and owners with regard to workplace safety in small metal fabrication businesses.
Parker, David;Brosseau, Lisa;Samant, Yogindra;Pan, Wei;Xi, Min;Haugan, Dave;, ;
Vol. 50 , No. 12 , pp. 999-1009
268 views Abstract
2019
Precarious working conditions and health of metropolitan bus drivers and conductors in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Simões, Mariana Roberta Lopes;Souza, Carla;Alcantara, Marcus Alessandro de;Assunção, Ada Ávila;
248 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.