Indexed in Journament

preventive veterinary medicine

ISSN 1873-1716· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,832 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 83.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name prev vet med
Abbreviated Name preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN 1873-1716
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/preventive-veterinary-medicine

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 55.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.1 7.8
Content Distribution 77.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

2013
wear of diamond-coated cutting tool inserts upon machining of al-12%si and glass fiber/polyester resin composites
;Nebojša Grahovac;Srboljub Stanković;Slavica Zec;Vesna Maksimović;Boris Grahovac;Dubravka Milovanović
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 69-72
524 views DOI Abstract
2016
Social network analysis provides insights into African swine fever epidemiology.
Lichoti, Jacqueline Kasiiti;Davies, Jocelyn;Kitala, Philip M;Githigia, Samuel M;Okoth, Edward;Maru, Yiheyis;Bukachi, Salome A;Bishop, Richard P;
Vol. 126 , pp. 1-10
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing a formula for sample size when using an imperfect test.
Cannon, Rob;
Vol. 172 , pp. 104789
451 views DOI
2019
Contamination of Italian parks with canine helminth eggs and health risk perception of the public.
Simonato, Giulia;Cassini, Rudi;Morelli, Simone;Di Cesare, Angela;La Torre, Francesco;Marcer, Federica;Traversa, Donato;Pietrobelli, Mario;Frangipane di Regalbono, Antonio;
Vol. 172 , pp. 104788
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dogs in public spaces of Buenos Aires, Argentina: Exploring patterns of the abundance of dogs, the canine faecal contamination, the behaviour of people with dogs, and its relationships with demographic/economic variables.
Rubel, Diana;Carbajo, Aníbal;
Vol. 170 , pp. 104713
415 views DOI Abstract
2014
Risk assessment and cost-effectiveness of animal health certification methods for livestock export in Somalia.
Knight-Jones, T J D;Njeumi, F;Elsawalhy, A;Wabacha, J;Rushton, J;
Vol. 113 , No. 4 , pp. 469-83
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of bootstrapped, regularised regression to identify factors associated with lamb-derived revenue on commercial sheep farms.
Lima, Eliana;Green, Martin;Lovatt, Fiona;Davies, Peers;King, Lis;Kaler, Jasmeet;
Vol. 174 , pp. 104851
407 views DOI Abstract
2020
Use of a generalized additive model for a spatial analysis of bovine brucellosis risk in the state of Mato Grosso in 2002 and 2014.
Souza Silva, Isana;Ioris Barddal, Janice Elena;Lopes Negreiros, Rísia;Oliveira, A C S;Aguiar, D M;
Vol. 176 , pp. 104938
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Backyard poultry production in Chile: animal health management and contribution to food access in an upper middle-income country.
Di Pillo, Francisca;Anríquez, Gustavo;Alarcón, Pablo;Jimenez-Bluhm, Pedro;Galdames, Pablo;Nieto, Vanesa;Schultz-Cherry, Stacey;Hamilton-West, Christopher;
Vol. 164 , pp. 41-48
396 views DOI Abstract
2020
Attitudes of cattle veterinarians and animal scientists to pain and painful procedures in Brazil.
Andrighetto Canozzi, Maria Eugênia;Rossi Borges, João Augusto;Jardim Barcellos, Júlio Otávio;
Vol. 177 , pp. 104909
388 views DOI Abstract
2021
Antimicrobial use, biosecurity, herd characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance in indicator Escherichia coli in ten Finnish pig farms
Yun J;Muurinen J;Nykäsenoja S;Seppä-Lassila L;Sali V;Suomi J;Tuominen P;Joutsen S;Hämäläinen M;Olkkola S;Myllyniemi AL;Peltoniemi O;Heinonen M;;
Vol. 193 , pp. -
245 views Abstract
2020
Management factors influencing the occurrence of cellulitis in broiler chickens.
Schulze Bernd, K;Wilms-Schulze Kump, A;Rohn, K;Reich, F;Kehrenberg, C;
Vol. 183 , pp. 105146
291 views DOI Abstract
2020
"Can we agree on that"? Plurality, power and language in participatory research.
Fischer, Klara;Schulz, Katja;Chenais, Erika;
Vol. 180 , pp. 104991
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Use of a generalized additive model for a spatial analysis of bovine brucellosis risk in the state of Mato Grosso in 2002 and 2014.
Souza Silva, Isana;Ioris Barddal, Janice Elena;Lopes Negreiros, Rísia;Oliveira, A C S;Aguiar, D M;
Vol. 176 , pp. 104938
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
Attitudes of cattle veterinarians and animal scientists to pain and painful procedures in Brazil.
Andrighetto Canozzi, Maria Eugênia;Rossi Borges, João Augusto;Jardim Barcellos, Júlio Otávio;
Vol. 177 , pp. 104909
388 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modeling the lumpy skin disease risk probability in central Zagros Mountains of Iran.
Ardestani, Elham Ghehsareh;Mokhtari, Azam;
Vol. 176 , pp. 104887
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
The role of farm business type on biosecurity practices in West Java broiler farms.
Indrawan, Dikky;Cahyadi, Eko Ruddy;Daryanto, Arief;Hogeveen, Henk;
Vol. 176 , pp. 104910
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing a formula for sample size when using an imperfect test.
Cannon, Rob;
Vol. 172 , pp. 104789
451 views DOI
2019
Oral bait preferences for rabies vaccination in free-ranging black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas) and non-target species in a multi-site field study in a peri-urban protected area in South Africa.
Koeppel, K N;Kuhn, B F;Thompson, P N;
Vol. 175 , pp. 104867
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of bootstrapped, regularised regression to identify factors associated with lamb-derived revenue on commercial sheep farms.
Lima, Eliana;Green, Martin;Lovatt, Fiona;Davies, Peers;King, Lis;Kaler, Jasmeet;
Vol. 174 , pp. 104851
407 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,832 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.