preventive veterinary medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#706 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

preventive veterinary medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name prev vet med
Abbreviated Name preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN 1873-1716
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/preventive-veterinary-medicine
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (49 total)

2013
wear of diamond-coated cutting tool inserts upon machining of al-12%si and glass fiber/polyester resin composites
;Nebojša Grahovac;Srboljub Stanković;Slavica Zec;Vesna Maksimović;Boris Grahovac;Dubravka Milovanović
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 69-72
462 views DOI Abstract
2016
Social network analysis provides insights into African swine fever epidemiology.
Lichoti, Jacqueline Kasiiti;Davies, Jocelyn;Kitala, Philip M;Githigia, Samuel M;Okoth, Edward;Maru, Yiheyis;Bukachi, Salome A;Bishop, Richard P;
Vol. 126 , pp. 1-10
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing a formula for sample size when using an imperfect test.
Cannon, Rob;
Vol. 172 , pp. 104789
394 views DOI
2019
Contamination of Italian parks with canine helminth eggs and health risk perception of the public.
Simonato, Giulia;Cassini, Rudi;Morelli, Simone;Di Cesare, Angela;La Torre, Francesco;Marcer, Federica;Traversa, Donato;Pietrobelli, Mario;Frangipane di Regalbono, Antonio;
Vol. 172 , pp. 104788
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dogs in public spaces of Buenos Aires, Argentina: Exploring patterns of the abundance of dogs, the canine faecal contamination, the behaviour of people with dogs, and its relationships with demographic/economic variables.
Rubel, Diana;Carbajo, Aníbal;
Vol. 170 , pp. 104713
371 views DOI Abstract
2014
Risk assessment and cost-effectiveness of animal health certification methods for livestock export in Somalia.
Knight-Jones, T J D;Njeumi, F;Elsawalhy, A;Wabacha, J;Rushton, J;
Vol. 113 , No. 4 , pp. 469-83
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of bootstrapped, regularised regression to identify factors associated with lamb-derived revenue on commercial sheep farms.
Lima, Eliana;Green, Martin;Lovatt, Fiona;Davies, Peers;King, Lis;Kaler, Jasmeet;
Vol. 174 , pp. 104851
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Use of a generalized additive model for a spatial analysis of bovine brucellosis risk in the state of Mato Grosso in 2002 and 2014.
Souza Silva, Isana;Ioris Barddal, Janice Elena;Lopes Negreiros, Rísia;Oliveira, A C S;Aguiar, D M;
Vol. 176 , pp. 104938
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Backyard poultry production in Chile: animal health management and contribution to food access in an upper middle-income country.
Di Pillo, Francisca;Anríquez, Gustavo;Alarcón, Pablo;Jimenez-Bluhm, Pedro;Galdames, Pablo;Nieto, Vanesa;Schultz-Cherry, Stacey;Hamilton-West, Christopher;
Vol. 164 , pp. 41-48
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cattle movements in Northern Ireland form a robust network: implications for disease management.
Brown, Emma;Marshall, Adele H;Mitchell, Hannah J;Byrne, Andrew W;
Vol. 170 , pp. 104740
334 views DOI Abstract
View All 49 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.