Antimicrobial use, biosecurity, herd characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance in indicator Escherichia coli in ten Finnish pig farms
Clicks: 248
ID: 271589
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
248 views
54 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #35 of 49 articles by views in preventive veterinary medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We investigated connections between antimicrobial use (AMU), biosecurity, and the numbers of pigs and staff in ten Finnish farrow-to-finish herds. Data on AMU in each herd were collected for 12 months. AMU was quantified as treatment incidences per 1000 days at risk (TI) using the consensus defined …
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (45 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
j2021preventiveantimicrobial
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Yun J;Muurinen J;Nykäsenoja S;Seppä-Lassila L;Sali V;Suomi J;Tuominen P;Joutsen S;Hämäläinen M;Olkkola S;Myllyniemi AL;Peltoniemi O;Heinonen M;; |
| Journal | preventive veterinary medicine |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.