value in health regional issues | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2839 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

value in health regional issues

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name value health reg issues
Abbreviated Name value health reg issues
ISSN 2212-1102
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/value-in-health-regional-issues
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (51 total)

2019
The Public Health Benefits and Economic Value of Routine Yellow Fever Vaccination in Colombia
Kieffer, A.
Vol. 20 , pp. 60-65
409 views DOI
2019
The Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Versus Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapies in Acute Kidney Injury: Perspective of the Social Services for the Elderly in Argentina.
Garay, Osvaldo Ulises;Palacios, Alfredo;Pichon-Riviere, Andrés;Augustovski, Federico;Martí, Sebastián García;Hernández-Vásquez, Akram;López, Elena Tapia;Rosa-Díez, Guillermo;Bardach, Ariel;
Vol. 20 , pp. 142-148
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Triple Therapy with Telaprevir and Boceprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C: A Decision Analysis from the Brazilian Public Health System Perspective
Borba, H.
Vol. 20 , pp. 95-102
385 views DOI
2019
Impact of Disparities in Reimbursement Rules Between Public and Private Sectors on Accessibility to Care in Moroccan Mandatory Health Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Cheikh, Amine;Bouatia, Mustapha;Ajaja, Mohamed Rida;El Malhouf, Naoufel;Cherrah, Yahia;Abouqal, Redouane;El Hassani, Amine;
Vol. 19 , pp. 132-137
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is There Something Else Beyond Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Public Health Decision Making?
Castañeda-Orjuela, Carlos;García-Molina, Mario;De la Hoz-Restrepo, Fernando;
Vol. 23 , pp. 1-5
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Budgetary Impact of Oral Rehabilitation with Complete Dentures: An Economical Evaluation from São Paulo State, Brazil
Pereira, A.
Vol. 20 , pp. 73-78
340 views DOI
2019
Analysis of Direct Monthly Cost of Outpatient Hospital-Based Care for Children With Cerebral Palsy in Kano, Nigeria.
Badaru, Umaru M;Abdulrahman, Hassan;Ahmad, Rufai Y;Lawal, Isa U;Zakari, Musa K;
Vol. 19 , pp. 145-150
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Estimation of Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy of Oral Cancer Patients: Integration of Lifetime Survival With Repeated Quality-of-Life Measurements
Chung, C.
Vol. 21 , pp. 59-65
319 views DOI
2020
Determining the Cost and Length of Stay at Intensive Care Units and the Factors Influencing Them in a Teaching Hospital in Malaysia
Aung, Y.
Vol. 21 , pp. 149-156
301 views DOI
2019
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Knowledge Needs Assessment for Latin America
Hughes, V.
Vol. 20 , pp. 2-6
301 views DOI
View All 51 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.