Impact of Disparities in Reimbursement Rules Between Public and Private Sectors on Accessibility to Care in Moroccan Mandatory Health Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Clicks: 389
ID: 25905
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 51 articles by views in value in health regional issues

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Disparities in the reimbursement rules between the 2 funds that manage mandatory health insurance in Morocco could negatively affect the accessibility of insured persons to healthcare services and products.The objective is to analyze the impact of these disparities on access to care and to assess the insured's copayment difference between the 2 funds.Healthcare utilization rates of the insured population in the 2 funds were analyzed by sector, sex, and age groups for 2014. We also looked at the percentage of copayment paid by the insured depending on the fund, methods of reimbursement, type of care, and nature of diseases. The analysis was based on data retrieved and aggregated at the National Agency for Health Insurance.The healthcare utilization rate differs significantly between the 2 funds. It is higher for the insured in the public sector (45%) compared with those in the private sector (18.5%) (P < .001). The healthcare utilization rate differs significantly according to the age groups in the 2 sectors (P < .001, respectively), and according to the sex of the insured in the 2 sectors (the healthcare utilization rate is higher for women than for men [P < .001, respectively]). The copayment percentage incurred by insured persons was 32.1% for employees in the public sector and 36.4% for employees in the private sector.Differences in reimbursement rules between the 2 funds may be the cause of inequity in access to care between insured persons. This situation can jeopardize the objectives of a universal and equitable health insurance scheme.
Reference Key
cheikh2019impactvalue Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cheikh, Amine;Bouatia, Mustapha;Ajaja, Mohamed Rida;El Malhouf, Naoufel;Cherrah, Yahia;Abouqal, Redouane;El Hassani, Amine;
Journal value in health regional issues
Year 2019
DOI
S2212-1099(19)30094-9
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.