Indexed in Journament

australasian psychiatry : bulletin of royal australian and new zealand college of psychiatrists

ISSN 1440-1665· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#8,307
Journament Rank
26
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name australas psychiatry
Abbreviated Name australas psychiatry
ISSN 1440-1665
URL http://apy.sagepub.com

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2007
The Green Card Clinic: overview of a brief patient-centred intervention following deliberate self-harm
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. -
488 views Abstract
2020
Impact of cognitive reserve on clinical and neuropsychological measures in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
, pp. 1039856220908171
432 views DOI Abstract
2017
Violence and self-harm in severe mental illness: inpatient study of associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol.
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 28-31
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Asiasiga: a Samoan intervention to address the immediate mental health needs of Samoan communities after a tsunami.
, pp. 1039856219866321
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and exploring linguistic expertise of psychiatrists in interviews with patients with thought disorder.
, pp. 1039856219889316
382 views DOI Abstract
2008
Can music preference indicate mental health status in young people?
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 284-8
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pasifika Study Group: a child and adolescent mental health capacity building and leadership workshop with Pacific nations doctors and psychiatrists.
, pp. 1039856219871893
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Documenting psychiatric risk: more than ticking boxes.
, pp. 1039856219859272
335 views DOI Abstract
2017
Divided we fall: clinicians and academic psychiatrists need to stand together.
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 437-439
311 views DOI Abstract
2016
the variable contact pressure influence on the tensile force in the process of strip sliding in the flat die in ironing
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 74-83
298 views Abstract
2020
Impact of cognitive reserve on clinical and neuropsychological measures in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
, pp. 1039856220908171
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and exploring linguistic expertise of psychiatrists in interviews with patients with thought disorder.
, pp. 1039856219889316
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pasifika Study Group: a child and adolescent mental health capacity building and leadership workshop with Pacific nations doctors and psychiatrists.
, pp. 1039856219871893
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Asiasiga: a Samoan intervention to address the immediate mental health needs of Samoan communities after a tsunami.
, pp. 1039856219866321
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Documenting psychiatric risk: more than ticking boxes.
, pp. 1039856219859272
335 views DOI Abstract
2017
Divided we fall: clinicians and academic psychiatrists need to stand together.
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 437-439
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
Violence and self-harm in severe mental illness: inpatient study of associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol.
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 28-31
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium alloy az91
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 27-32
204 views Abstract
2016
the variable contact pressure influence on the tensile force in the process of strip sliding in the flat die in ironing
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 74-83
298 views Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.