australasian psychiatry : bulletin of royal australian and new zealand college of psychiatrists | Journament

Journal Ranking

#355 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 9 hours ago

australasian psychiatry : bulletin of royal australian and new zealand college of psychiatrists

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name australas psychiatry
Abbreviated Name australas psychiatry
ISSN 1440-1665
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2007
The Green Card Clinic: overview of a brief patient-centred intervention following deliberate self-harm
Wilhelm K;Finch A;Kotze B;Arnold K;McDonald G;Sternhell P;Hudson B;;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. -
401 views Abstract
2020
Impact of cognitive reserve on clinical and neuropsychological measures in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Haussmann, Robert;von Lieres Und Wilkau, Amrei F E;Sauer, Cathrin;Nilles, Fabienne;Donix, Markus;
, pp. 1039856220908171
326 views DOI Abstract
2008
Can music preference indicate mental health status in young people?
Baker, Felicity;Bor, William;
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 284-8
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Asiasiga: a Samoan intervention to address the immediate mental health needs of Samoan communities after a tsunami.
Tamasese, Taimalieutu Kiwi;Parsons, Tafaoimalo Loudeen;Waldegrave, Charles;Sawrey, Richard;Bush, Allister;
, pp. 1039856219866321
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and exploring linguistic expertise of psychiatrists in interviews with patients with thought disorder.
Galletly, Cherrie;Ash, David;Sweeney, Shaun;O'Neill, Fiona;Crichton, Jonathan;
, pp. 1039856219889316
295 views DOI Abstract
2017
Violence and self-harm in severe mental illness: inpatient study of associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol.
Dharmawardene, Vajira;Menkes, David B;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 28-31
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pasifika Study Group: a child and adolescent mental health capacity building and leadership workshop with Pacific nations doctors and psychiatrists.
Robertson, Paul;Hagali, Monica;Allen, Myrielle;Leao-Tuitama, George;Kowalenko, Nick;Bush, Allister;
, pp. 1039856219871893
273 views DOI Abstract
2019
Documenting psychiatric risk: more than ticking boxes.
Ng, Lillian;Zeng, Irene;Kalinowski, Coni;Watson, Peter;
, pp. 1039856219859272
267 views DOI Abstract
2017
Divided we fall: clinicians and academic psychiatrists need to stand together.
Allison, Stephen;Bastiampillai, Tarun;Battersby, Malcolm;
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 437-439
253 views DOI Abstract
2016
the variable contact pressure influence on the tensile force in the process of strip sliding in the flat die in ironing
;Milan Djordjević;Srbislav Aleksandrović;Vukic Lazić;Dusan Arsić;Ruzica R. Nikolić;Branislav Hadzima
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 74-83
232 views Abstract
View All 26 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.