Indexed in Journament

australasian psychiatry : bulletin of royal australian and new zealand college of psychiatrists

ISSN 1440-1665· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,602 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 16.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name australas psychiatry
Abbreviated Name australas psychiatry
ISSN 1440-1665
URL http://apy.sagepub.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for australasian psychiatry : bulletin of royal australian and new zealand college of psychiatrists
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 11.1 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 61.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2007
The Green Card Clinic: overview of a brief patient-centred intervention following deliberate self-harm
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. -
503 views Abstract
2020
Impact of cognitive reserve on clinical and neuropsychological measures in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
, pp. 1039856220908171
455 views DOI Abstract
2017
Violence and self-harm in severe mental illness: inpatient study of associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol.
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 28-31
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and exploring linguistic expertise of psychiatrists in interviews with patients with thought disorder.
, pp. 1039856219889316
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Asiasiga: a Samoan intervention to address the immediate mental health needs of Samoan communities after a tsunami.
, pp. 1039856219866321
397 views DOI Abstract
2008
Can music preference indicate mental health status in young people?
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 284-8
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pasifika Study Group: a child and adolescent mental health capacity building and leadership workshop with Pacific nations doctors and psychiatrists.
, pp. 1039856219871893
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Documenting psychiatric risk: more than ticking boxes.
, pp. 1039856219859272
347 views DOI Abstract
2017
Divided we fall: clinicians and academic psychiatrists need to stand together.
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 437-439
321 views DOI Abstract
2016
the variable contact pressure influence on the tensile force in the process of strip sliding in the flat die in ironing
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 74-83
316 views Abstract
2020
Impact of cognitive reserve on clinical and neuropsychological measures in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
, pp. 1039856220908171
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying and exploring linguistic expertise of psychiatrists in interviews with patients with thought disorder.
, pp. 1039856219889316
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pasifika Study Group: a child and adolescent mental health capacity building and leadership workshop with Pacific nations doctors and psychiatrists.
, pp. 1039856219871893
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Asiasiga: a Samoan intervention to address the immediate mental health needs of Samoan communities after a tsunami.
, pp. 1039856219866321
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Documenting psychiatric risk: more than ticking boxes.
, pp. 1039856219859272
347 views DOI Abstract
2017
Divided we fall: clinicians and academic psychiatrists need to stand together.
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 437-439
321 views DOI Abstract
2017
Violence and self-harm in severe mental illness: inpatient study of associations with ethnicity, cannabis and alcohol.
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 28-31
422 views DOI Abstract
2016
influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium alloy az91
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 27-32
212 views Abstract
2016
the variable contact pressure influence on the tensile force in the process of strip sliding in the flat die in ironing
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 74-83
316 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,602 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.