biosystems and biorobotics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3206 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

biosystems and biorobotics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name biosystems and biorobotics
Abbreviated Name biosystems and biorobotics
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

tecnogran: todo piso serÁ palco. toda parede, mural. e a cidade inteira, poesia.
;Danielle Denes dos Santos Carstens;Ticiana Braga De Vincenzi;Bruno Henrique Rocha Fernandes;Franciani Fernandes Galvão
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 519-537
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
Taxing Robots: Clarifications on Legal and Economic Capacity, Capacity to Act and Representation
Falcón, Pulido Á.
Vol. 25 , pp. 40-44
340 views DOI
2011
gestão social e ambiental em pequenas e médias empresas: influência e poder dos stakeholders social and enviromental management in small and medium enterprises: power and influence of stakeholders
;José Edson Moysés Filho;Andrea Leite Rodrigues;Sérgio Luiz do Amaral Moretti
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 204-236
340 views DOI Abstract
2011
análise dos atributos para avaliação da qualidade da informação nos ambientes de intranet para apoio à gestão do conhecimento analice de los atributos para evaluación de la calidad de la información en los ambientes de intranet para apoyo a la gestión del conocimiento analysis of attributes for information quality evaluation in intranet environments to support knowledge managment
;Ana Lúcia Batista Trindade;Mírian Oliveira;Grace Vieira Becker
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 776-801
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Wearable Robotics: Perspectives from the Work of the COST Action on Wearable Robots
Felzmann, H.
Vol. 25 , pp. 92-97
311 views DOI
2020
Women and Robotics
Amesti, Mendizábal M.
Vol. 25 , pp. 88-91
311 views DOI
estudo em clusters tecnolÓgicos ibero americanos
;Fabio Lamartine Barbosa Toledo;Keller Mafioletti;Mohamed Amal;Marianne Hoeltgebaum
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 453-477
293 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cartography of the Values Involved in Robotics
López, D.
Vol. 25 , pp. 98-104
287 views DOI
2020
How Do Older People Think and Feel About Robots in Health- and Elderly Care?
Frennert, S.
Vol. 25 , pp. 167-174
274 views DOI
2020
“Meet Me Halfway,” Said the Robot to the Regulation: Linking Ex-Ante Technology Impact Assessments to Legislative Ex-Post Evaluations via Shared Data Repositories for Robot Governance
Fosch-Villaronga, E.
Vol. 25 , pp. 113-119
272 views DOI
View All 18 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.