clinical interventions in aging | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3950 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

clinical interventions in aging

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name clin interv aging
Abbreviated Name clinical interventions in aging
ISSN 1178-1998
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.dovepress.com/clinical-interventions-in-aging-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2016
Prediction of critical illness in elderly outpatients using elder risk assessment: a population-based study
M, Biehl;PY, Takahashi;SS, Cha;R, Chaudhry;O, Gajic;B, Thorsteinsdottir;
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 829-834
421 views Abstract
2017
Texture-modified food and fluids in dementia and residential aged care facilities
V, Painter;DG, Le Couteur;LM, Waite;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 1193-1203
380 views Abstract
2019
Endoscopic dissection of refractory pancreatic duct stricture via accessory pancreatic duct approach for concurrent treatment of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction in aging patients.
Wang, Tao;Liu, Dan-Qing;Wen, Xu-Dong;Zhang, Bing-Yin;Liu, Wei-Hui;
Vol. 14 , pp. 557-563
376 views DOI Abstract
2013
a construÇÃo do conhecimento sobre ensino e aprendizagem em contabilidade: um olhar sobre os congressos usp e anpcont no perÍodo de 2007 a 2011
;Morjane Armstrong Santos;Elaine Gonçalves Pires;Magno Oliveira Macambira;Adriano Leal Bruni
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 71-84
374 views Abstract
2016
The influence of frailty syndrome on medication adherence among elderly patients with hypertension
B, Jankowska-Polańska;K, Dudek;A, Szymanska-Chabowska;I, Uchmanowicz;
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1781-1790
350 views Abstract
2019
Utilization, effect, and benefit of the individualized Meeting Centers Support Program for people with dementia and caregivers.
Dröes, Rose-Marie;van Rijn, Annelies;Rus, Eline;Dacier, Seghoslène;Meiland, Franka;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1527-1553
349 views DOI Abstract
2017
Assessment of effects of differences in trunk posture during Fowler’s position on hemodynamics and cardiovascular regulation in older and younger subjects
S, Kubota;Y, Endo;M, Kubota;T, Shigemasa;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 603-610
342 views Abstract
2019
Habitual sugar intake and cognitive impairment among multi-ethnic Malaysian older adults.
Chong, C P;Shahar, S;Haron, H;Din, N Che;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1331-1342
324 views DOI Abstract
2016
Legal medical consideration of Alzheimer’s disease patients’ dysgraphia and cognitive dysfunction a 6 month follow up
E, Onofri;M, Mercuri;T, Archer;M, Rapp-Ricciardi;S, Ricci;
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 279-284
289 views Abstract
2013
análise financeira de hospitais: um estudo sobre o hospital metropolitano de urgência e emergência
;Antônio Artur de Souza;Ewerton Alex Avelar;Bernardo Franco Tormin;Emerson Alves da Silva
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 90-105
258 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.