kaohsiung journal of medical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1063 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

kaohsiung journal of medical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj ulakbim
Short Name kaohsiung journal of medical sciences
Abbreviated Name kaohsiung journal of medical sciences
ISSN 1607-551X
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/24108650
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2014
effects of carbohydrate supplements on exercise-induced menstrual dysfunction and ovarian subcellular structural changes in rats
;Can Zhao;Xiao-Li Liu;Run-Xiao Hong;He Li;Rena Li;Ren-Wei Wang
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 189-195
454 views DOI Abstract
2016
time-dependent gene expression analysis after mouse skeletal muscle contusion
;Weihua Xiao;Yu Liu;Beibei Luo;Linlin Zhao;Xiaoguang Liu;Zhigang Zeng;Peijie Chen
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 101-108
453 views DOI Abstract
2016
effects of age on marathon finishing time among male amateur runners in stockholm marathon 1979–2014
;Niklas Lehto
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 349-354
436 views DOI Abstract
2015
integrating biomechanical and motor control principles in elite high jumpers: a transdisciplinary approach to enhancing sport performance
;James Becker;Will F.W. Wu
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 341-346
414 views DOI Abstract
2016
recruitment of older adults into randomized controlled trials: issues and lessons learned from two community-based exercise interventions in shanghai
;Lingyan Huang;Jiaojiao Lü;Nan Chen;Yu Liu
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 308-314
399 views DOI Abstract
2016
physical activity, sedentary behavior, and long-term cardiovascular risk in young people: a review and discussion of methodology in prospective studies
;Jakob Tarp;Jan Christian Brønd;Lars Bo Andersen;Niels Christian Møller;Karsten Froberg;Anders Grøntved
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 145-150
383 views DOI Abstract
2015
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (bdnf) as a potential mechanism of the effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance
;Aaron T. Piepmeier;Jennifer L. Etnier
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 14-23
340 views DOI Abstract
2016
the public health benefits of tai ji quan—addressing the unmet needs of aging populations in the 21st century
;Fuzhong Li
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 304-307
305 views DOI
2014
so much research, so little application: barriers to dissemination and practical implementation of tai ji quan
;Peter A. Harmer
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 16-20
279 views DOI Abstract
2009
A Framework for Enhancing and Assessing Cultural Competency Training
Lie, Désirée;
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 486-492
264 views Abstract
View All 26 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.