Indexed in Journament

kaohsiung journal of medical sciences

ISSN 1607-551X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,007 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 59% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name kaohsiung journal of medical sciences
Abbreviated Name kaohsiung journal of medical sciences
ISSN 1607-551X
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/24108650

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 72.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.7 5.8
Content Distribution 72.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2016
time-dependent gene expression analysis after mouse skeletal muscle contusion
;Weihua Xiao;Yu Liu;Beibei Luo;Linlin Zhao;Xiaoguang Liu;Zhigang Zeng;Peijie Chen
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 101-108
512 views DOI Abstract
2014
effects of carbohydrate supplements on exercise-induced menstrual dysfunction and ovarian subcellular structural changes in rats
;Can Zhao;Xiao-Li Liu;Run-Xiao Hong;He Li;Rena Li;Ren-Wei Wang
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 189-195
508 views DOI Abstract
2016
effects of age on marathon finishing time among male amateur runners in stockholm marathon 1979–2014
;Niklas Lehto
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 349-354
494 views DOI Abstract
2015
integrating biomechanical and motor control principles in elite high jumpers: a transdisciplinary approach to enhancing sport performance
;James Becker;Will F.W. Wu
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 341-346
469 views DOI Abstract
2016
recruitment of older adults into randomized controlled trials: issues and lessons learned from two community-based exercise interventions in shanghai
;Lingyan Huang;Jiaojiao Lü;Nan Chen;Yu Liu
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 308-314
465 views DOI Abstract
2016
physical activity, sedentary behavior, and long-term cardiovascular risk in young people: a review and discussion of methodology in prospective studies
;Jakob Tarp;Jan Christian Brønd;Lars Bo Andersen;Niels Christian Møller;Karsten Froberg;Anders Grøntved
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 145-150
452 views DOI Abstract
2015
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (bdnf) as a potential mechanism of the effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance
;Aaron T. Piepmeier;Jennifer L. Etnier
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 14-23
388 views DOI Abstract
2016
the public health benefits of tai ji quan—addressing the unmet needs of aging populations in the 21st century
;Fuzhong Li
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 304-307
350 views DOI
2014
so much research, so little application: barriers to dissemination and practical implementation of tai ji quan
;Peter A. Harmer
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 16-20
321 views DOI Abstract
2017
twelve weeks of dance exergaming in overweight and obese adolescent girls: transfer effects on physical activity, screen time, and self-efficacy
;Amanda E. Staiano;Robbie A. Beyl;Daniel S. Hsia;Peter T. Katzmarzyk;Robert L. Newton, Jr
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 4-10
318 views DOI Abstract
2018
non-exhaustive double effort test is reliable and estimates the first ventilatory threshold intensity in running exercise
;Lucas Dantas Maia Forte;Fúlvia Barros Manchado-Gobatto;Roberta Cunha Matheus Rodrigues;Maria Cecília Gallani;Claudio Alexandre Gobatto
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 197-203
235 views Abstract
2017
twelve weeks of dance exergaming in overweight and obese adolescent girls: transfer effects on physical activity, screen time, and self-efficacy
;Amanda E. Staiano;Robbie A. Beyl;Daniel S. Hsia;Peter T. Katzmarzyk;Robert L. Newton, Jr
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 4-10
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
influence of different sports on fat mass and lean mass in growing girls
;Esther Ubago-Guisado;Esmeralda Mata;Javier Sánchez-Sánchez;María Plaza-Carmona;María Martín-García;Leonor Gallardo
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 213-218
183 views DOI Abstract
2017
why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries
;Irene S. Davis;Hannah M. Rice;Scott C. Wearing
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 154-161
301 views DOI Abstract
2017
school-based physical activity interventions for children and youth: keys for success
;Arto Gråstén
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 290-291
225 views DOI
2017
how does high-intensity intermittent training affect recreational endurance runners? acute and chronic adaptations: a systematic review
;Felipe García-Pinillos;Víctor M. Soto-Hermoso;Pedro A. Latorre-Román
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 54-67
274 views DOI Abstract
2016
the public health benefits of tai ji quan—addressing the unmet needs of aging populations in the 21st century
;Fuzhong Li
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 304-307
350 views DOI
2016
associations between individual and environmental factors and habitual physical activity among older chinese adults: a social–ecological perspective
;Xiangren Yi;Zachary Pope;Zan Gao;Shumei Wang;Fang Pan;Jingpeng Yan;Meng Liu;Peipei Wu;Jingjing Xu;Rui Wang
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 315-321
225 views DOI Abstract
2016
imagery perspective among young athletes: differentiation between external and internal visual imagery
;Qiu-Hua Yu;Amy S.N. Fu;Adeline Kho;Jie Li;Xiao-Hua Sun;Chetwyn C.H. Chan
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 211-218
182 views DOI Abstract
2016
recruitment of older adults into randomized controlled trials: issues and lessons learned from two community-based exercise interventions in shanghai
;Lingyan Huang;Jiaojiao Lü;Nan Chen;Yu Liu
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 308-314
465 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,007 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.