Indexed in Journament

european journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie

ISSN 1633-8065· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,000 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 21.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j orthop surg traumatol
Abbreviated Name eur j orthop surg traumatol
ISSN 1633-8065
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/590

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for european journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 73.2 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2016
serial crystallography captures enzyme catalysis in copper nitrite reductase at atomic resolution from one crystal
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 271-281
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Publication integrity in orthopaedic journals: the self-citation in orthopaedic research (SCOR) threshold.
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Negative prognostic factors in surgical treatment for trimalleolar fractures
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. -
389 views Abstract
2015
sub-atomic resolution x-ray crystallography and neutron crystallography: promise, challenges and potential
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 464-474
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Volar PEEK plate for distal radius fracture: analysis of adverse events.
370 views DOI Abstract
2018
crystal structure of peroxiredoxin 3 from vibrio vulnificus and its implications for scavenging peroxides and nitric oxide
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 82-92
352 views DOI Abstract
2017
mix-and-diffuse serial synchrotron crystallography
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 769-777
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surgical management for recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients.
344 views DOI Abstract
2015
advanced ensemble modelling of flexible macromolecules using x-ray solution scattering
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 207-217
307 views DOI Abstract
2015
solving coiled-coil protein structures
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 164-165
301 views DOI
2020
Volar PEEK plate for distal radius fracture: analysis of adverse events.
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Negative prognostic factors in surgical treatment for trimalleolar fractures
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. -
389 views Abstract
2019
Publication integrity in orthopaedic journals: the self-citation in orthopaedic research (SCOR) threshold.
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surgical management for recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients.
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
crystal structure of peroxiredoxin 3 from vibrio vulnificus and its implications for scavenging peroxides and nitric oxide
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 82-92
352 views DOI Abstract
2018
ionic scattering factors of atoms that compose biological molecules
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 348-353
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
crystallographic features of the martensitic transformation and their impact on variant organization in the intermetallic compound ni50mn38sb12 studied by sem/ebsd
Vol. 4 , No. 5 , pp. 700-709
186 views DOI Abstract
2017
analysis of xfel serial diffraction data from individual crystalline fibrils
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 795-811
189 views DOI Abstract
2017
fifteen years of the protein crystallography station: the coming of age of macromolecular neutron crystallography
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 72-86
211 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,000 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.