Indexed in Journament

Disability and rehabilitation

ISSN 1464-5165· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,617 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
231 Articles
Scores higher than 91% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Disabil Rehabil
Abbreviated Name disabil rehabil
ISSN 1464-5165
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/idre

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 66.0 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 68.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (231)

2019
Sources of income following a rejected disability pension application: a sequence analysis study.
Perhoniemi, Riku;Blomgren, Jenni;Laaksonen, Mikko;
, pp. 1-9
498 views DOI Abstract
2019
Addressing intimate partner violence with female patients with chronic physical disabilities: the role of physical therapists.
Ballan, Michelle S;Freyer, Molly;
, pp. 1-6
482 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation, roles, and responsibilities of Filipino occupational therapists in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.
Ching, Peñafrancia E;Lazaro, Rolando T;
, pp. 1-8
480 views DOI Abstract
2015
crystal structure of bis(2,2′-bipyridine-κ2n,n′)bis(thiocyanato-κn)manganese(ii) 2,2′-bipyridine monosolvate
;Stefan Suckert;Inke Jess;Christian Näther
Vol. 71 , No. 1 , pp. m3-m4
480 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using a dyadic approach to explore parental support for physical activity among young cancer survivors.
Price, Jenson;Wurz, Amanda;Ramphal, Raveena;Wilson, Kathleen;Brunet, Jennifer;
, pp. 1-9
478 views DOI Abstract
2019
Virtual reality and video games in cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review.
García-Bravo, Sara;Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia;Campuzano-Ruiz, Raquel;López-Navas, María Jesús;Domínguez-Paniagua, Joaquín;Araújo-Narváez, Aurora;Barreñada-Copete, Estrella;García-Bravo, Cristina;Flórez-García, Mariano Tomás;Botas-Rodríguez, Javier;Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto;
, pp. 1-10
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychosocial working conditions and the subjective prognosis of gainful employment among employees with asthma: a cross-sectional study.
Heinrichs, Katherina;Hummel, Stefan;Gholami, Jalal;Schultz, Konrad;Wild, Burkhard;Li, Jian;Sheikh, Aziz;Loerbroks, Adrian;
, pp. 1-8
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disclosure and workplace accommodations for people with autism: a systematic review.
Lindsay, Sally;Osten, Victoria;Rezai, Mana;Bui, Sunny;
, pp. 1-14
454 views DOI Abstract
2015
crystal structure of 5-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-3-(4-methylphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1h-pyrazole-1-carbaldehyde
;Farook Adam;Seranthimata Samshuddin;Nadiah Ameram;Subramaya;Laxminarayana Samartha
Vol. 71 , No. 12 , pp. o1031-o1032
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using Rasch and factor analysis to develop a Proxy-Reported health state classification (descriptive) system for Cerebral Palsy.
Bahrampour, Mina;Downes, Martin;Boyd, Roslyn N;Scuffham, Paul A;Byrnes, Joshua;
, pp. 1-9
435 views DOI Abstract
2024
Stroke recovery-what are people talking about on Twitter? A content analysis.
Gallacher, Katie I;Petrie, Daniel;McAdie, Diane Rasmussen;McGuire, Paula;Quinn, Terence J;
, pp. 1-7
91 views DOI Abstract
2020
crystal structure of lutetium aluminate (luam), lu4al2o9
;Rayko Simura;Hisanori Yamane
Vol. 76 , No. 5 , pp. 752-755
266 views DOI Abstract
2020
2-o-monoalkyl isosorbide ethers with c8, c10, c12 and c14 chain lengths
;Felix Geburtig;Volkmar Vill
Vol. 76 , No. 6 , pp. 924-928
179 views DOI Abstract
2020
"A little bit of a guidance and a little bit of group support": a qualitative study of preferences, barriers, and facilitators to participating in community-based exercise opportunities among adults living with chronic pain.
Dnes, Natalie;Coley, Bridget;Frisby, Kaitlyn;Keller, Anna;Suyom, Jezreel;Tsui, Cindy;Grant, Gillian;Vader, Kyle;Hunter, Judith;
, pp. 1-10
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Identifying clinicians' priorities for the implementation of best practices in cognitive rehabilitation post-acquired brain injury.
Poulin, Valérie;Jean, Alexandra;Lamontagne, Marie-Ève;Pellerin, Marc-André;Viau-Guay, Anabelle;Ouellet, Marie-Christine;
, pp. 1-11
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chance health locus of control beliefs in Hindu Nepali patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction relates to perceived sports knee function and symptoms.
Nyland, John;Parajuli, Kishor;Singh, Rajesh;Gautam, Arjun;Smith, Austin;Pandey, Chakra;
, pp. 1-6
390 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using Rasch and factor analysis to develop a Proxy-Reported health state classification (descriptive) system for Cerebral Palsy.
Bahrampour, Mina;Downes, Martin;Boyd, Roslyn N;Scuffham, Paul A;Byrnes, Joshua;
, pp. 1-9
435 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing significant others' cognitions and behavioral responses in occupational health care for workers with a chronic disease.
Snippen, Nicole C;de Vries, Haitze J;de Wit, Mariska;van der Burg-Vermeulen, Sylvia J;Brouwer, Sandra;Hagedoorn, Mariët;
, pp. 1-14
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using a dyadic approach to explore parental support for physical activity among young cancer survivors.
Price, Jenson;Wurz, Amanda;Ramphal, Raveena;Wilson, Kathleen;Brunet, Jennifer;
, pp. 1-9
478 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceptions of disability, environmental risk factors and available services among local leaders and parents of young children with disabilities in West Timor, Indonesia
Kiling, I.
Vol. 41 , pp. 2421-2432
235 views DOI
Journament Score
42.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,617 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.