Indexed in Journament

current opinion in psychology

ISSN 2352-2518· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,594 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 26.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name curr opin psychol
Abbreviated Name current opinion in psychology
ISSN 2352-2518
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-psychology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 47.0 28.8
Innovation 40.5 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 57.7 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2020
Self-disclosure and social media: motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being
Luo, M.
Vol. 31 , pp. 110-115
445 views DOI
2019
Socio-ecological roots of cultures of honor.
Uskul, Ayse K;Cross, Susan E;
Vol. 32 , pp. 177-180
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards
Kaniasty, K.
Vol. 32 , pp. 105-109
389 views DOI
2019
Chronotype, circadian rhythms and mood.
Bauducco, Serena;Richardson, Cele;Gradisar, Michael;
Vol. 34 , pp. 77-83
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
The context of low socioeconomic status can undermine people's motivation for financial success
Laurin, K.
Vol. 33 , pp. 105-109
371 views DOI
2019
Power, status, and social judgment.
Hasty, Connor;Maner, Jon K;
Vol. 33 , pp. 1-5
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Voice pitch: a window into the communication of social power
Aung, T.
Vol. 33 , pp. 154-161
325 views DOI
2019
How hierarchy shapes our emotional lives: effects of power and status on emotional experience, expression, and responsiveness.
van Kleef, Gerben A;Lange, Jens;
Vol. 33 , pp. 148-153
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
A socioecological psychology of racism: making structures and history more visible
Trawalter, S.
Vol. 32 , pp. 47-51
319 views DOI
2020
Studying the impact of built environments on human mental health in everyday life: methodological developments, state-of-the-art and technological frontiers
Reichert, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 158-164
316 views DOI
2021
What works for adolescents with borderline personality disorder: towards a developmentally informed understanding and structured treatment model
Bo, S.
Vol. 37 , pp. 7-12
128 views DOI
2021
What we know — and want to know — about Family Connections: a review from the perspective of lived experience
Courey, L.
Vol. 37 , pp. 44-48
125 views DOI
2020
Sleep in PTSD: treatment approaches and outcomes
Miller, K.
Vol. 34 , pp. 12-17
51 views DOI
2020
Voice pitch: a window into the communication of social power
Aung, T.
Vol. 33 , pp. 154-161
325 views DOI
2020
Cultural diversity and its implications for intergroup relations
Verkuyten, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1-5
185 views DOI
2020
Emerging evidence of cultural differences linked to rice versus wheat agriculture
Talhelm, T.
Vol. 32 , pp. 81-88
129 views DOI
2020
Self-disclosure and social media: motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being
Luo, M.
Vol. 31 , pp. 110-115
445 views DOI
2020
Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular responses to shifting status
Scheepers, D.
Vol. 33 , pp. 115-119
194 views DOI
2020
Why increases in adolescent depression may be linked to the technological environment
Twenge, J.
Vol. 32 , pp. 89-94
147 views DOI
2020
Studying the impact of built environments on human mental health in everyday life: methodological developments, state-of-the-art and technological frontiers
Reichert, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 158-164
316 views DOI
Journament Score
30.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,594 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

47.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.