Indexed in Journament

revista facultad nacional de agronomía medellín

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5/100
Journament Score
#13,191
Journament Rank
38
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name revista facultad nacional de agronomía medellín
Abbreviated Name revista facultad nacional de agronomía medellín

Indexings

scopus doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2010
REVISIÓN: MICROENCAPSULACIÓN DE ALIMENTOS FOOD MICROENCAPSULATION: A REVIEW
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 5669-5684
725 views Abstract
2013
Prediction Models for Total Milk Yield and Fat Percentage Using Partial Samples / Modelos de Predicción para Producción de Leche Total y Porcentaje de Grasa a Partir de Muestreos Parciales
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 6909-6917
403 views Abstract
2008
LO RURAL. UN CAMPO INACABADO THE RURAL AREA: AN UNFINISHED “FIELD”
Vol. 61 , No. 2 , pp. 4480-4495
339 views Abstract
1999
calibration of all-sky cameras and tilting-photometers using an integrating-sphere and a spectrometer
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improvement of the agricultural productivity of lettuce and radish by using efficient microorganisms
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 8937-8943
284 views Abstract
1999
activities of the wintering party of the 34th japanese antarctic research expedition in 1993-1994
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 424-458
279 views DOI Abstract
2018
timing of efficient snow clearance for summer operation at syowa station
Vol. 62 , pp. 1-14
264 views DOI Abstract
1999
new seismic monitoring observation system and data accessibility at syowa station
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 16-44
262 views DOI Abstract
1996
quantitative chemical analyses of rocks with x-ray fluorescence analyzer: (2) trace elements
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 53-63
260 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improvement of the agricultural productivity of lettuce and radish by using efficient microorganisms
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 8937-8943
284 views Abstract
2018
timing of efficient snow clearance for summer operation at syowa station
Vol. 62 , pp. 1-14
264 views DOI Abstract
2014
report on 1st and 2nd joint workshops on australian and japanese collaboration in antarctic science and related achievements
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 71-88
139 views DOI Abstract
2014
reprocessing of shirase shipborne gravity data
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 295-308
109 views DOI Abstract
2013
Prediction Models for Total Milk Yield and Fat Percentage Using Partial Samples / Modelos de Predicción para Producción de Leche Total y Porcentaje de Grasa a Partir de Muestreos Parciales
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 6909-6917
403 views Abstract
2012
2012
circumboreal diatom navicula streckerae lange-bert. & witk., especially on lineolae
Vol. 56 , No. 3 , pp. 259-283
124 views DOI Abstract
2010
seasonal and annual variations of aerosol concentrations in the troposphere and stratosphere over syowa station observed by a balloon-borne optical particle counter
Vol. 54 , No. special issue , pp. 760-778
66 views DOI Abstract
2010
gravitational separation of major atmospheric components observed in the stratosphere over syowa station, antarctica, kiruna, sweden and sanriku, japan.
Vol. 54 , No. special issue , pp. 426-437
180 views DOI Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.