journal of food and drug analysis | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2048 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of food and drug analysis

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name j food drug anal
Abbreviated Name j food drug anal
ISSN 1021-9498
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.jfda-online.com/journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2017
incidence and antibiotic susceptibility profile of staphylococcus aureus isolates from wounds of patients at specialist hospital, sokoto, nigeria
;Ahmed Olowo-Okere;Razak Funsho Atata;Agboola Abass;Adeiza Suleiman Shuaibu;Ungokore Hussain Yahya;Nuhu Tanko
Vol. 6 , No. 3, 4 , pp. 44-50
651 views Abstract
2015
an in vitro assessment of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of nanosilver
;Rokhsareh Sadeghi;Parviz Owlia;Roya Yaraee;Fatemeh Sharif;Ferial Taleghani
Vol. 1 , No. 3-4 , pp. 44-52
568 views Abstract
2017
evaluation of antimicrobial activity of probiotic lactobacillus strains against growth and urease activity of proteus spp.
;Leila Goudarzi;Rouha Kasra Kermanshahi;Zahra Moosavi-Nejad;Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dalla
Vol. 6 , No. 3, 4 , pp. 31-43
548 views Abstract
2015
antimicrobial effect of nano-zinc oxide and nano-chitosan particles in dental composite used in orthodontics
;AmirHossein Mirhashemi;Abbas Bahador;MohammadZaman Kassaee;Ghazaleh Daryakenari;MohammadSadegh Ahmad-Akhoundi;Ahmad Sodagar
Vol. 2 , No. 3-4 , pp. 1-10
496 views Abstract
2019
Quercetin facilitates cell death and chemosensitivity through RAGE/PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis in human pancreatic cancer cells.
Lan, Chieh-Yu;Chen, Sheng-Yi;Kuo, Chia-Wen;Lu, Chi-Cheng;Yen, Gow-Chin;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 887-896
417 views DOI Abstract
2018
Simultaneous determination of four amides in Saururus chinensis by matrix solid phase dispersion and high-performance liquid chromatography method.
Chen, Hongjiang;Liu, Jianan;Cui, Mingchao;Chen, Jianwei;Li, Xiang;Chen, Yong;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 362-368
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
The impact of gallic acid on the methotrexate-induced kidney damage in rats
Asci, Halil;Ozmen, Ozlem;Ellidag, Hamit Yasar;Aydin, Bunyamin;Bas, Ercan;Yilmaz, Necat;
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 890-897
352 views DOI Abstract
2015
Simultaneous determination of some common food dyes in commercial products by digital image analysis
Sorouraddin, Mohammad-Hossein;Saadati, Masoud;Mirabi, Fariba;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 447-452
325 views Abstract
2015
emerging trend of acinetobacter nosocomial infection in northeast of iran
;Samaneh Saed;Malektaj Yazdanpanah;Mitra Lal-Dehghani;AmirReza Khalighi;Mahbubeh Honarmand;Parviz Afrough;Kiarash Ghazvini
Vol. 2 , No. 3-4 , pp. 56-61
325 views Abstract
2019
Potential prebiotics and their transmission mechanisms: Recent approaches.
Khangwal, Ishu;Shukla, Pratyoosh;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 649-656
323 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.