Indexed in Journament

mahila pratishtha

ISSN ISSN 2454-7891 (Print)· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,881 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 35.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
AI Quality Analysis
35.2 / 100
Separate paid analysis — does not affect the Journament Score or ranking.

About This Journal

Mahila Pratishtha is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal published quarterly (January, April, July, October) from Andhra Pradesh. It is a special journal to discuss about the women issues, problems, polocies, programmes and perspectives. The aim of this journal is “To publish accurate, research based information on women, child children and gender issues written by research scholars, academicians, NGOs, policy makers and Government officials, thereby help to raise the discussion on women issues, schemes, welfare programmes in India and the globe”. Mahila Pratishtha welcomes research papers, review articles, research notes and book reviews on topics which broadly come under the purview of women, girl children, third gender and other gender related issues. The articles are also invited from science, engineering and medicine disciplines where the articles are related to the issues of Women, Gender Studies, Girl children and Third Gender.
Short Name mahila pratishtha
Abbreviated Name mahila pratishtha
ISSN ISSN 2454-7891 (Print)
URL http://www.deshvikaspublications.com/
Author Instructions mahilapratishtha@gmail.com

Quality Profile

11 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

1 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for mahila pratishtha
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 43.5 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 77.2 88.4
Content Quality 40.0 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 30.0 40.2
Editorial Standards 25.0 33.4
Publication Regularity 50.0 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.0 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2015
mityczno-symboliczny paradygmat etniczności johna a. armstronga
, No. 46 , pp. 64-71
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
wielokulturowość: lekcje przeszłości
, No. 48 , pp. 245-250
285 views DOI Abstract
2017
non-citizens in latvia: is it a real problem?
, No. 49 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
2015
ariowie i turańczycy. poglądy franciszka h. duchińskiego na temat rasy i cywilizacji
, No. 46 , pp. 46-63
237 views DOI Abstract
2017
od redakcji [editorial]
, No. 49 , pp. -
236 views DOI
2016
the representation of legitimacy in sassanian coins (kavad i and zamasp eras)
, No. 47 , pp. 95-103
225 views DOI Abstract
2017
nowe szaty króla? konstruowanie i rekonstruowanie tradycji etnicznych we współczesnej buriacji
, No. 49 , pp. -
220 views DOI Abstract
2017
non-citizens in latvia: is it a real problem?
, No. 49 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
od redakcji [editorial]
, No. 49 , pp. -
236 views DOI
2017
nowe szaty króla? konstruowanie i rekonstruowanie tradycji etnicznych we współczesnej buriacji
, No. 49 , pp. -
220 views DOI Abstract
2016
the representation of legitimacy in sassanian coins (kavad i and zamasp eras)
, No. 47 , pp. 95-103
225 views DOI Abstract
2016
wielokulturowość: lekcje przeszłości
, No. 48 , pp. 245-250
285 views DOI Abstract
2016
theorizing polish migration across europe: perspectives, concepts, and methodologies
, No. 48 , pp. 106-127
157 views DOI Abstract
2016
dzieło sztuki na granicy przeszłości i przyszłości. historia i patriotyzm w sztuce nieprofesjonalnej
, No. 47 , pp. 104-115
116 views DOI Abstract
2015
mityczno-symboliczny paradygmat etniczności johna a. armstronga
, No. 46 , pp. 64-71
403 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,881 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis 35.2/100

Overall Quality Score

32.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 3 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

43.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

30.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

40.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

25.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

50.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

30.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 3 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.