chinese journal of lung cancer | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4322 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

chinese journal of lung cancer

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name chinese journal of lung cancer
Abbreviated Name chinese journal of lung cancer
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2011
Analysis of Prognostic Factors in 541 Female Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
WU, Meina;WANG, Yuyan;AN, Tongtong;ZHAO, Jun;YANG, Lu;DUAN, Jianchun;WANG, Zhijie;ZHUO, Minglei;BAI, Hua;LIU, Xuyi;WANG, Jie;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 245-250
561 views Abstract
2014
Joint Serum Tumor Markers Serve as survival predictive model of Erlotinib in the treatment of recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
SHAO, Lan;HONG, Wei;ZHENG, Lei;HE, Chunxiao;ZHANG, Beibei;XIE, Fajun;SONG, Zhengbo;LOU, Guangyuan;ZHANG, Yiping;
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 391-400
382 views Abstract
2012
Screening Key Genes Associated with the Development and Progression of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Gene-enrichment Analysis and Meta-analysis
HE, Wenwu;XIAN, Lei;WANG, Yongyong;HU, Yanling;CHEN, Mingwu;
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 416-421
332 views Abstract
2011
Sealing of Airway Fistulas for Metallic Covered Z-type Stents
WANG, Hongwu;LI, Dongmei;ZHANG, Nan;ZOU, Hang;LUO, Lingfei;MA, Hongming;ZHOU, Yunzhi;LI, Jing;LIANG, Sujuan;
Vol. 14 , No. 8 , pp. 679-684
322 views Abstract
2011
Descriptive Study on the Epidemiology of Lung Cancer in Coal-producing Area in Eastern Yunnan, China
LI, Jihua;ZHANG, Yunsheng;LI, Yun;YIN, Guoqing;LI, Yuebing;NING, Bofu;GUO, Jiamin;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 107-119
315 views Abstract
2016
ultrafast optical imaging technology: principles and applications of emerging methods
;Mikami Hideharu;Gao Liang;Goda Keisuke
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 497-509
300 views DOI Abstract
2016
spectral methods for determining the stability and noise performance of passively modelocked lasers
;Menyuk Curtis R.;Wang Shaokang
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 332-350
296 views DOI Abstract
2017
mid-infrared integrated photonics on silicon: a perspective
;Lin Hongtao;Luo Zhengqian;Gu Tian;Kimerling Lionel C.;Wada Kazumi;Agarwal Anu;Hu Juejun
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 393-420
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
progress in neuromorphic photonics
;Ferreira de Lima Thomas;Shastri Bhavin J.;Tait Alexander N.;Nahmias Mitchell A.;Prucnal Paul R.
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 577-599
239 views DOI Abstract
2018
specialized directional beaming through a metalens and a typical application
;Zhao Kangyi;Zhang Hui;Fu Yongqi;Zhu Shaoli
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 339-345
212 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.