advances in medical education and practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2715 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

advances in medical education and practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name adv med educ pract
Abbreviated Name adv med educ pract
ISSN 1179-7258
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/advances-in-medical-education-and-practice-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2019
Medical student learning styles: does it really matter? [Letter].
Rashid, Ahsan;Shah, Hasan Ali;Allaf, Mohammed;
Vol. 10 , pp. 513-514
459 views DOI
2010
Innoversity in knowledge-for-action and adaptation to climate change: the first steps of an 'evidence-based climatic health' transfrontier training program.
Lapaige, Véronique;Essiembre, Hélène;
Vol. 1 , pp. 89-105
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Internet use and eHealth literacy among health-care professionals in a resource limited setting: a cross-sectional survey.
Shiferaw, Kirubel Biruk;Mehari, Eden Abetu;
Vol. 10 , pp. 563-570
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medical students' perceptions of their learning environment during clinical years at Chitwan Medical College in Nepal.
Shah, Dev Kumar;Piryani, Suneel;Piryani, Rano Mal;Islam, Mohammad Nazrul;Jha, Rajesh Kumar;Deo, Gopendra Prasad;
Vol. 10 , pp. 555-562
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceptions Of Medical Students Regarding Excellence In Student Engagement: A Multi-Center Saudi Arabian Perspective.
Bukhari, Yousef R;Bin Abdulrahman, Amro K;AlShammari, Abdullah A;Almuzayrie, Abdulaziz F;Al Zahrani, Waleed M;AlSabbagh, Mohammed O;Bin Abdulrahman, Khalid A;
Vol. 10 , pp. 849-854
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Internet use and eHealth literacy among health-care professionals in a resource limited setting: a cross-sectional survey [Letter].
Velazquez-Pimentel, Diana;Trockels, Amaury;Smith, Eleanor;
Vol. 10 , pp. 803-804
374 views DOI
2019
Turning the oil tanker: a novel approach to shifting perspectives in medical practice.
Ranasinghe, Lasith;Dor, Frank Jmf;Herbert, Paul;
Vol. 10 , pp. 507-511
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationship between self-efficacy and some demographic and socioeconomic variables among Iranian Medical Sciences students.
Seyedi-Andi, Seyed Jalil;Bakouei, Fatemeh;Adib Rad, Hajar;Khafri, Soraya;Salavati, Asgari;
Vol. 10 , pp. 645-651
364 views DOI Abstract
2017
Innovative partnerships to advance public health training in community-based academic residency programs
JC, Lo;TE, Baudendistel;A, Dandekar;PV, Le;S, Siu;B, Blumberg;
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 703-706
352 views Abstract
2011
Transforming nursing education: a review of stressors and strategies that support students' professional socialization
D, Del Prato;E, Bankert;P, Grust;J, Joseph;
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 109-116
320 views Abstract
View All 31 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.