Indexed in Journament

journal of neurosurgery

ISSN 1933-0693· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.9/100
Journament Score
#7,742
Journament Rank
53
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j neurosurg
Abbreviated Name j neurosurg
ISSN 1933-0693
URL http://www.thejns.org

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (53)

2017
Aggressive resection at the infiltrative margins of glioblastoma facilitated by intraoperative fluorescein guidance.
Neira, Justin A;Ung, Timothy H;Sims, Jennifer S;Malone, Hani R;Chow, Daniel S;Samanamud, Jorge L;Zanazzi, George J;Guo, Xiaotao;Bowden, Stephen G;Zhao, Binsheng;Sheth, Sameer A;McKhann, Guy M;Sisti, Michael B;Canoll, Peter;D'Amico, Randy S;Bruce, Jeffrey N;
Vol. 127 , No. 1 , pp. 111-122
594 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phase I trial of caudate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant tinnitus.
Cheung, Steven W;Racine, Caroline A;Henderson-Sabes, Jennifer;Demopoulos, Carly;Molinaro, Annette M;Heath, Susan;Nagarajan, Srikantan S;Bourne, Andrea L;Rietcheck, John E;Wang, Sarah S;Larson, Paul S;
, pp. 1-10
484 views DOI Abstract
1992
Usefulness of beta 2-transferrin assay in the detection of cerebrospinal fluid leaks following head injury
Ryall RG;Peacock MK;Simpson DA;;
Vol. 77 , No. 5 , pp. -
469 views Abstract
2019
Comparison of 5-aminolevulinic acid and sodium fluorescein for intraoperative tumor visualization in patients with high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study.
Hansen, Rasmus W;Pedersen, Christian B;Halle, Bo;Korshoej, Anders R;Schulz, Mette K;Kristensen, Bjarne W;Poulsen, Frantz R;
, pp. 1-8
458 views DOI Abstract
2019
Telerobotic stroke intervention: a novel solution to the care dissemination dilemma.
Panesar, Sandip S;Volpi, John J;Lumsden, Alan;Desai, Virendra;Kleiman, Neal S;Sample, Trevis L;Elkins, Eric;Britz, Gavin W;
, pp. 1-8
429 views DOI
2019
Impact of facility type and volume in low-grade glioma outcomes.
Zhu, Ping;Du, Xianglin L;Blanco, Angel I;Ballester, Leomar Y;Tandon, Nitin;Berger, Mitchel S;Zhu, Jay-Jiguang;Esquenazi, Yoshua;
, pp. 1-11
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increased complication and mortality among non-index hospital readmissions after brain tumor resection is associated with low-volume readmitting hospitals.
Jarvis, Casey A;Bakhsheshian, Joshua;Ding, Li;Wen, Timothy;Tang, Austin M;Yuan, Edith;Giannotta, Steven L;Mack, William J;Attenello, Frank J;
, pp. 1-13
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Usefulness of positron emission tomography for differentiating gliomas according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system.
Takei, Hiroaki;Shinoda, Jun;Ikuta, Soko;Maruyama, Takashi;Muragaki, Yoshihiro;Kawasaki, Tomohiro;Ikegame, Yuka;Okada, Makoto;Ito, Takeshi;Asano, Yoshitaka;Yokoyama, Kazutoshi;Nakayama, Noriyuki;Yano, Hirohito;Iwama, Toru;
, pp. 1-10
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
A multicenter, open-label, controlled trial on acceptance, convenience, and complications of rechargeable internal pulse generators for deep brain stimulation: the Multi Recharge Trial.
Jakobs, Martin;Helmers, Ann-Kristin;Synowitz, Michael;Slotty, Philipp J;Anthofer, Judith M;Schlaier, Jürgen R;Kloss, Manja;Unterberg, Andreas W;Kiening, Karl L;
, pp. 1-9
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
One hundred years of neurosurgery: contributions of American women.
Corley, Jacquelyn;Kim, Eliana;Philips, Chris Ann;Stippler, Martina;Parr, Ann M;Sweet, Jennifer;Rosseau, Gail;
, pp. 1-6
389 views DOI Abstract
2021
Status epilepticus after intracranial neurosurgery: incidence and risk stratification by perioperative clinical features
Jin MC;Parker JJ;Zhang M;Medress ZA;Halpern CH;Li G;Ratliff JK;Grant GA;Fisher RS;Skirboll S;;
, pp. -
142 views Abstract
2020
Surgical management of incidentally discovered low-grade gliomas
Gogos AJ;Young JS;Pereira MP;Morshed RA;Potts MB;Hervey-Jumper SL;Berger MS;;
, pp. -
145 views Abstract
2020
Editorial. Impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgery resident training and education.
Bambakidis, Nicholas C;Tomei, Krystal L;
, pp. 1-2
293 views DOI
2020
Editorial. Innovations in neurosurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: is it time to reexamine our neurosurgical training models?
Tomlinson, Samuel B;Hendricks, Benjamin K;Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A;
, pp. 1-2
387 views DOI
2020
Editorial. COVID-19 and academic neurosurgery.
Carter, Bob S;Chiocca, E Antonio;
, pp. 1-2
280 views DOI
2020
Editorial. COVID-19 and its impact on neurosurgery: our early experience in Singapore.
Lee, Zhiquan Damian;Chyi Yeu, David Low;Ang, Beng Ti;Ng, Wai Hoe;Seow, Wan Tew;
, pp. 1-2
322 views DOI
2020
Editorial. A neurosurgery resident's response to COVID-19: anything but routine.
Choi, Bryan D;
, pp. 1-2
284 views DOI
2020
Editorial. Neurosurgical priority setting during a pandemic: COVID-19.
Bernstein, Mark;
, pp. 1-2
273 views DOI
2020
Editorial. Endonasal neurosurgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Singapore perspective.
Lo, Yu Tung;Yang Teo, Neville Wei;Ang, Beng Ti;
, pp. 1-3
315 views DOI
2020
Editorial. COVID-19 outbreak and its countermeasures in the Republic of Korea.
Kim, Kyung Hyun;Choi, Eun Hwa;Kim, Seung-Ki;
, pp. 1-2
324 views DOI
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.