Indexed in Journament

zhidkie kristally i ikh prakticheskoe ispol'zovanie

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,766 of 23,453 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 41.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name zhidkie kristally i ikh prakticheskoe ispol'zovanie
Abbreviated Name zhidkie kristally i ikh prakticheskoe ispol'zovanie

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for zhidkie kristally i ikh prakticheskoe ispol'zovanie
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.0
Accessibility 15.0 19.5
Timeliness 50.0 33.8
Diversity 30.0 30.1
Innovation 40.0 36.0
Community Impact 31.0 22.8
Content Distribution 70.0 86.4
Content Quality 54.2
Ethics & Transparency 39.5
Editorial Standards 32.5
Publication Regularity 51.6
Geographic Reach 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2013
physical self-concept, anthropometry and body composition in preadolescents
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 17-28
240 views Abstract
2012
heart rate reproducibility assessed by surrogate data analysis
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
211 views Abstract
2011
santorio santorio - the pioneer of evidence based medicine
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 49-56
171 views Abstract
2012
a large human centrifuge for exploration and exploitation research
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
157 views Abstract
2015
differences in the knee torque between high- and low-bar back squat techniques. a pilot study
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 141-151
156 views Abstract
2016
an overview of training methods that promote the highest lipid oxidation during and after a single exercise session
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 93-118
154 views Abstract
2011
the hormonal crosstalks inside santorio on his weighing chair
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 58-65
145 views Abstract
2010
twitch parameters in transversal and longitudinal biceps brachii response
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
141 views Abstract
2017
report from the round table "a kinesiologist in the labour market"
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 175-180
135 views
2017
report from the round table "a kinesiologist in the labour market"
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 175-180
135 views
2016
an overview of training methods that promote the highest lipid oxidation during and after a single exercise session
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 93-118
154 views Abstract
2016
recommendations for achieving medium- and high-intensity physical / sport activity in physical education to improve the health and learning of children and adolescents
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 137-148
6 views Abstract
2015
differences in the knee torque between high- and low-bar back squat techniques. a pilot study
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 141-151
156 views Abstract
2013
physical self-concept, anthropometry and body composition in preadolescents
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 17-28
240 views Abstract
2012
a large human centrifuge for exploration and exploitation research
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
157 views Abstract
2012
heart rate reproducibility assessed by surrogate data analysis
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
211 views Abstract
2012
a new non-invasive device to monitor core temperature on earth and in space
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
84 views Abstract
2011
stars and particles: words of the universe
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 139-149
99 views Abstract
Journament Score
38.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,766 of 23,453 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.