cancer prevention research (philadelphia, pa) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9332 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

cancer prevention research (philadelphia, pa)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name cancer prev res (phila)
Abbreviated Name cancer prev res (phila)
ISSN 1940-6215
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2020
Intercepting Endometrial Cancer: Opportunities to Expand Access Using New Technology.
DeStephano, Christopher C;Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N;Kaunitz, Andrew M;Ridgeway, Jennifer L;Sherman, Mark E;
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mushroom consumption and risk of total and site-specific cancer in two large US prospective cohorts.
Lee, Dong Hoon;Yang, Meng;Keum, NaNa;Giovannucci, Edward L;Sun, Qi;Chavarro, Jorge E;
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of systemic exposure to toxic and/or carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during vaping, smoking, and abstention.
St Helen, Gideon;Liakoni, Evangelia;Nardone, Natalie;Addo, Newton;Jacob, Peyton;Benowitz, Neal L;
376 views DOI Abstract
2016
konsep demokrasi islam dalam pandangan kuntowijoyo (studi pada sejarah peradaban islam)
;M. Sirajudin Fikri
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 95-104
339 views Abstract
2015
metode dakwah dalam membentuk akhlak mahmudah remaja
;Nurseri Hasnah Nasution
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 163-177
312 views Abstract
2017
metode dakwah rasulullah saw kepada golongan non muslim di madinah
;Dalinur M Nur
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 80-93
257 views Abstract
2016
akhlak sebagai azas kebahagiaan keluarga dan masyarakat
;Aliasan Aliasan
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 33-51
244 views Abstract
2015
metode bibliotherapy pada kisah nabi yusuf as sebagai media konseling rasional emotif
;Neni Noviza
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 53-70
211 views Abstract
2016
etika dan moralitas organisasi pemerintah
;Ainur Ropik
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 197-207
196 views Abstract
2016
peran dakwah dalam memperbaiki masyarakat bughot
;Candra Darmawan
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 167-178
177 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.