Comparison of systemic exposure to toxic and/or carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during vaping, smoking, and abstention.

Clicks: 406
ID: 61829
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3 of 18 articles by views in cancer prevention research (philadelphia, pa)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Comparisons of systemic exposure to toxicants during monitored cigarette smoking, electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and abstention are needed to enhance our understanding of the risks of e-cigarette use (vaping). In a crossover study, we measured 10 mercapturic acid metabolites of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in 24-h urine samples collected from 36 dual users (8 women) of e-cigarettes and cigarettes during two days of ad libitum vaping or cigarette-only use, and two days of enforced abstention. Concentrations of VOC metabolites were higher during smoking compared to vaping, except for the methylating agents metabolite. The fold-difference in concentrations when smoking relative to vaping ranged from 1.31 (1.06-1.61) (GM, 95% CI) (1,3-butadiene) to 7.09 (5.88-8.54) (acrylonitrile). Metabolites of acrylamide [fold difference of 1.21 (1.03-1.43)] and benzene [1.46 (1.13-1.90)] were higher during vaping compared to abstention. The 1,3-butadiene and propylene oxide metabolites were higher in variable-power tank users compared to users of cig-a-likes. E-cigarettes expose users to lower levels of toxic VOCs compared to cigarette smoking, supporting their harm reduction potential among smokers. However, some e-cigarettes expose users to VOCs such as acrylamide, benzene, and propylene oxide, and may pose health risks to nonsmoking users. The results of our study will inform regulators in assessing e-cigarettes with respect to the balance between its potential harm reduction for adult smokers and risk to nonsmoking users.
Reference Key
st-helen2019comparisoncancer Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors St Helen, Gideon;Liakoni, Evangelia;Nardone, Natalie;Addo, Newton;Jacob, Peyton;Benowitz, Neal L;
Journal cancer prevention research (philadelphia, pa)
Year 2019
DOI
canprevres.0356.2019
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.