Comparison of systemic exposure to toxic and/or carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during vaping, smoking, and abstention.

Clicks: 439
ID: 61829
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3 of 18 articles by views in cancer prevention research (philadelphia, pa)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Comparisons of systemic exposure to toxicants during monitored cigarette smoking, electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and abstention are needed to enhance our understanding of the risks of e-cigarette use (vaping). In a crossover study, we measured 10 mercapturic acid metabolites of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in 24-h urine samples collected from 36 dual users (8 women) of e-cigarettes and cigarettes during two days of ad libitum vaping or cigarette-only use, and two days of enforced abstention. Concentrations of VOC metabolites were higher during smoking compared to vaping, except for the methylating agents metabolite. The fold-difference in concentrations when smoking relative to vaping ranged from 1.31 (1.06-1.61) (GM, 95% CI) (1,3-butadiene) to 7.09 (5.88-8.54) (acrylonitrile). Metabolites of acrylamide [fold difference of 1.21 (1.03-1.43)] and benzene [1.46 (1.13-1.90)] were higher during vaping compared to abstention. The 1,3-butadiene and propylene oxide metabolites were higher in variable-power tank users compared to users of cig-a-likes. E-cigarettes expose users to lower levels of toxic VOCs compared to cigarette smoking, supporting their harm reduction potential among smokers. However, some e-cigarettes expose users to VOCs such as acrylamide, benzene, and propylene oxide, and may pose health risks to nonsmoking users. The results of our study will inform regulators in assessing e-cigarettes with respect to the balance between its potential harm reduction for adult smokers and risk to nonsmoking users.
Reference Key
st-helen2019comparisoncancer Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal cancer prevention research (philadelphia, pa)
Year 2019
DOI
canprevres.0356.2019
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.