journal of arid environments | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1686 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of arid environments

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of arid environments
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0140-1963
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-arid-environments
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2019
The farm income and food security implications of adopting fertilizer micro-dosing and tied-ridge technologies under semi-arid environments in central Tanzania
Habtemariam L.
Vol. 166 , pp. 60-67
404 views DOI
2017
unpacking changes in mangrove social-ecological systems: lessons from brazil, zanzibar, and vietnam
;Claire H. Quinn;Lindsay C. Stringer;Rachel J. Berman;Hue T.V. Le;Flower E. Msuya;Juarez C.B. Pezzuti;Steven E. Orchard
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
321 views DOI Abstract
2014
subject knowledge and perceptions of bioenergy among school teachers in india: results from a survey
;Pradipta Halder;Sari Havu-Nuutinen;Janne Pietarinen;Anas Zyadin;Paavo Pelkonen
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 599-613
308 views DOI Abstract
2015
from goals to action: the efforts for increasing energy efficiency and integration of renewable sources in eskilstuna, sweden
;Iana Vassileva;Richard Thygesen;Javier Campillo;Sebastian Schwede
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 548-565
285 views DOI Abstract
2016
environmental and energy performance of ethanol production from the integration of sugarcane, corn, and grain sorghum in a multipurpose plant
;Ana Donke;Alex Nogueira;Patricia Matai;Luiz Kulay
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-
280 views DOI Abstract
2014
exploring the potential of a german living lab research infrastructure for the development of low resource products and services
;Justus von Geibler;Lorenz Erdmann;Christa Liedtke;Holger Rohn;Matthias Stabe;Simon Berner;Kristin Leismann;Kathrin Schnalzer;Katharina Kennedy
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 575-598
272 views DOI Abstract
2017
toward a framework for resource efficiency evaluation in industry: recommendations for research and innovation projects
;Sophie Sfez;Jo Dewulf;Wouter De Soete;Thomas Schaubroeck;Fabrice Mathieux;Dana Kralisch;Steven De Meester
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
the energy-water nexus: spatially-resolved analysis of the potential for desalinating brackish groundwater by use of solar energy
;Jill B. Kjellsson;Michael E. Webber
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 476-489
262 views DOI Abstract
2016
environmental impacts of rare earth mining and separation based on eudialyte: a new european way
;Andrea Schreiber;Josefine Marx;Petra Zapp;Jürgen-Friedrich Hake;Daniel Voßenkaul;Bernd Friedrich
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 32-
241 views DOI Abstract
2007
Migration of sand dunes on the northern Alxa Plateau, Inner Mongolia, China
Yao, Z.
Vol. 70 , pp. 80-93
235 views DOI
View All 24 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.