Indexed in Journament

global food security

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,831 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 80.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name global food security

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 61.1
Innovation 45.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 73.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 61.1 25.8
Innovation 45.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 73.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2019
Adaptation, mitigation and food security: Multi-criteria ranking system for climate-smart agriculture technologies illustrated for rainfed rice in Laos
Wassmann R.
Vol. 23 , pp. 33-40
411 views DOI
2019
Adaptation, mitigation and food security: Multi-criteria ranking system for climate-smart agriculture technologies illustrated for rainfed rice in Laos
Wassmann, R.
Vol. 23 , pp. 33-40
321 views DOI
2011
detecting urban growth using remote sensing and gis techniques in al gharbiya governorate, egypt
;A.A. Belal;F.S. Moghanm
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 73-79
321 views DOI Abstract
2015
estimation of soil moisture using multispectral and ftir techniques
;Syed Muhammad Zubair Younis;Javed Iqbal
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 151-161
302 views DOI Abstract
2016
estimating soil fertility status in physically degraded land using gis and remote sensing techniques in chamarajanagar district, karnataka, india
;Mohamed A.E. AbdelRahman;A. Natarajan;C.A. Srinivasamurthy;Rajendra Hegde
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 95-108
299 views DOI Abstract
2010
wireless mobile field-based gis science and technology for crisis management process: a case study of a fire event, cairo, egypt
;I.H. EL-Gamily;G. Selim;E.A. Hermas
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 21-29
297 views DOI Abstract
2015
land use change mapping and analysis using remote sensing and gis: a case study of simly watershed, islamabad, pakistan
;Amna Butt;Rabia Shabbir;Sheikh Saeed Ahmad;Neelam Aziz
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 251-259
280 views DOI Abstract
2015
land resources assessment of el-galaba basin, south egypt for the potentiality of agriculture expansion using remote sensing and gis techniques
;A.M. Saleh;A.B. Belal;E.S. Mohamed
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. S19-S30
277 views DOI Abstract
2015
spatio-temporal analysis of urban growth from remote sensing data in bandar abbas city, iran
;Mohsen Dadras;Helmi Z.M. Shafri;Noordin Ahmad;Biswajeet Pradhan;Sahabeh Safarpour
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 35-52
273 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adapting the Women's empowerment in agriculture index to specific country context: Insights and critiques from fieldwork in India
Gupta, S.
Vol. 23 , pp. 245-255
270 views DOI
2020
multi-temporal forest cover change detection in the metchie-ngoum protection forest reserve, west region of cameroon
;Reeves Meli Fokeng;Walter Gadinga Forje;Vivien Meli Meli;Bernard Nyuyki Bodzemo
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 113-124
218 views Abstract
2020
Integrated assessment of crop production and resource use efficiency indicators for the U.S. Corn Belt
Riccetto, S.
Vol. 24 , pp. 0-0
196 views DOI
2019
Adapting the Women's empowerment in agriculture index to specific country context: Insights and critiques from fieldwork in India
Gupta, S.
Vol. 23 , pp. 245-255
270 views DOI
2019
Resources for women's agency, household food security, and women's dietary diversity in urban Bangladesh
Sinharoy, S.
Vol. 23 , pp. 1-8
194 views DOI
2019
Maize crop nutrient input requirements for food security in sub-Saharan Africa
ten, Berge H.
Vol. 23 , pp. 9-21
175 views DOI
2019
Microencapsulated diets to improve bivalve shellfish aquaculture for global food security
Willer, D.
Vol. 23 , pp. 64-73
182 views DOI
2019
Making the Paris agreement climate targets consistent with food security objectives
Doelman, J.
Vol. 23 , pp. 93-103
143 views DOI
2019
Women's empowerment, food security and nutrition of pastoral communities in Tanzania
Galiè, A.
Vol. 23 , pp. 125-134
200 views DOI
2019
From women's empowerment to food security: Revisiting global discourses through a cross-country analysis
Clement, F.
Vol. 23 , pp. 160-172
138 views DOI
2019
Science-based intensive agriculture: Sustainability, food security, and the role of technology
Gaffney, J.
Vol. 23 , pp. 236-244
141 views DOI
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,831 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

45.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.