Indexed in Journament

journal of electroanalytical chemistry

ISSN 1572-6657· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,002 of 33,995 indexed journals
22 Articles
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of electroanalytical chemistry
ISSN 1572-6657
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/504087/description

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

2015
the acceptability, usability and short-term outcomes of get real: a web-based program for psychotic-like experiences (ples)
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 266-271
399 views DOI Abstract
2015
living smart — a randomized controlled trial of a guided online course teaching adults with adhd or sub-clinical adhd to use smartphones to structure their everyday life
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 24-31
378 views DOI Abstract
2015
current research and trends in the use of smartphone applications for mood disorders
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 169-173
348 views DOI Abstract
2014
self-supervised, mobile-application based cognitive training of auditory attention: a behavioral and fmri evaluation
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 102-110
331 views DOI Abstract
2016
interformat reliability of the patient health questionnaire: validation of the computerized version of the phq-9
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 1-4
315 views DOI Abstract
2017
guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mild and moderate depression: a benchmarking study
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 1-8
314 views DOI Abstract
2015
experiences of non-adherence to internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy: a qualitative study
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 137-142
309 views DOI Abstract
2015
who seeks icbt for depression and how do they get there? effects of recruitment source on patient demographics and clinical characteristics
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 221-225
302 views DOI Abstract
2018
development and pilot evaluation of an online psychoeducational program for suicide prevention among university students: a randomised controlled trial
Vol. 12 , pp. 111-120
211 views Abstract
2018
comparing usage of a web and app stress management intervention: an observational study
Vol. 12 , pp. 74-82
135 views Abstract
2018
using multi-relational data mining to discriminate blended therapy efficiency on patients based on log data
Vol. 12 , pp. 176-180
177 views Abstract
2017
guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mild and moderate depression: a benchmarking study
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 1-8
314 views DOI Abstract
2017
characteristics of participants in a randomized trial of an internet intervention for depression (evident) in comparison to a national sample (degs1)
Vol. 9 , No. C , pp. 46-50
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
the impact of phone calls on follow-up rates in an online depression prevention study
Vol. 8 , No. C , pp. 10-14
242 views DOI Abstract
2016
blended internet care for patients with severe mental illnesses: an open label prospective controlled cohort pilot study
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 51-55
244 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,002 of 33,995
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.