Indexed in Journament

postepy biochemii

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,370 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 27% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name postepy biochemii
URL https://postepybiochemii.ptbioch.edu.pl

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 16.7 26.2
Innovation 49.5 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.7
Content Distribution 75.2 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2008
among maintaining “bandeiristas” traditions, the mining influence and the polyculture: topics of the rural architecture from itu [sp], brazil
;Maurício Maiolo Lopes
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 32-40
747 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Membrane receptors recognizing MAMP/PAMP and DAMP molecules that activate first line of defence in plant immune system].
Hetmann, Anna;Kowalczyk, Stanisław;
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. 29-45
416 views DOI Abstract
2018
Membrane receptors recognizing MAMP/PAMP and DAMP molecules that activate first line of defence in plant immune system
Hetmann A.
Vol. 64 , pp. 29-45
401 views
2014
cement, oil and industrial paternalism in mendoza (1930-1994)
;Graciela Moretti
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 17-34
354 views DOI Abstract
2007
immigration and rural property in fruit circuit [sp]
;Fernando Antonio Abrahão
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 48-50
337 views DOI Abstract
2016
a french company town in baja california desert: compagnie du boleo, santa rosalía 1885
;Enrique Esteban Gómez Cavazos
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 74-84
329 views DOI Abstract
2013
use of construction waste in the removal of hydrogen sulfide
;Larissa Helena Rocha Meira;Herlane Costa Calheiros
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 47-56
326 views DOI Abstract
2014
a socio environmental approach on coastal federal patrimony management in brazil
;Marina Christofidis
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 50-63
323 views DOI Abstract
2014
the company town design and pedro cornú: industrial development and architecture in mexico (1861-1913)
;Alejandro Acosta Collazo
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 101-111
322 views DOI Abstract
2015
reflections about theoretical notions of social perception relative to cultural landscape
;Gabriela Neme Araujo
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 103-113
319 views DOI Abstract
2018
[fábricas y redes] culturales. patrimonio industrial estratégico para conectar el territorio
;Kyra Romero Branchadell
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 47-70
298 views DOI Abstract
2018
Membrane receptors recognizing MAMP/PAMP and DAMP molecules that activate first line of defence in plant immune system
Hetmann A.
Vol. 64 , pp. 29-45
401 views
2018
[Membrane receptors recognizing MAMP/PAMP and DAMP molecules that activate first line of defence in plant immune system].
Hetmann, Anna;Kowalczyk, Stanisław;
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. 29-45
416 views DOI Abstract
2017
avaliação do papel dos telhados verdes no desenho e desenvolvimento urbano de baixo impacto ambiental e no controle de enchentes na cidade do rio de janeiro
;Dayana Martins Nunes;Luciene Pimentel da Silva;Paulo Luiz da Fonseca
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 374-393
214 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative morphological analysis: the network of the villages of itapeva, apiaí and itapetininga founded in the territory of são paulo under the government of morgado de mateus
;Caio Júlio Guedes;Ivone Salgado
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 296-312
289 views DOI Abstract
2016
a french company town in baja california desert: compagnie du boleo, santa rosalía 1885
;Enrique Esteban Gómez Cavazos
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 74-84
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
medición del Índice de desarrollo del hábitat de aguascalientes (ideha)
;Mauricio Ruiz Morales;Alejandro Acosta Collazo
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 128-142
232 views DOI Abstract
2016
power production feasibility analysis from landfill gas in cruzeiro [sp, brazil]: three different scenarios
;Leticia de Oliveira Silva;Matheus Martins Lopes;Germán Andres Lozano Vela;Luiz Otávio Campos de Medeiros;Paulo Antonio de Souza Junior
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 7-16
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
a gestão dos recursos hídricos e da estiagem no oeste catarinense: contribuição para uma análise sistêmica complexa
;Mário Jorge Cardoso Coelho Freitas;Patrícia Taeko Kaetsu
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 34-50
225 views DOI Abstract
2015
ajuste e avaliação dos modelos agregados de estimativas de custo de pchs no brasil.
;Ivan Felipe Santos;Geralo Lucio Tiago Filho;Regina Manbeli Barros;Helmo Lemos
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 13-22
198 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,370 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

16.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

49.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.