cement, oil and industrial paternalism in mendoza (1930-1994)
Clicks: 335
ID: 158977
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
335 views
66 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 32 articles by views in postepy biochemii
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
During the thirties in the province of Mendoza, companies installed extractive industries developed strategies for creating neighborhoods of workers by industrial plants. Both state and private owners generated villages in the vicinity of the joint where cement or oil was produced. There paternalistic policies applied to consolidate the workforce who lived near the factories and distilleries. After six decades of uninterrupted work in the province, the cement industry and the oil changes were a result of globalization in the world economy, neoliberalism and the end of industrial paternalism, both private and state nature. This article looks at the evolution of the sets from the beginning to the end of the model.
| Reference Key |
moretti2014laborcement,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Graciela Moretti |
| Journal | postepy biochemii |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.20396/lobore.v8i4.195
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.