journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (oxford, oxfordshire : 1986) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1424 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ أسبوعين

journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (oxford, oxfordshire : 1986)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
الاسم المختصر journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (oxford, oxfordshire : 1986)
الاسم المختصر
ISSN
الهدف والنطاق
URL
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2019
Review: Membrane Materials for the Removal of Water from Industrial Solvents by Pervaporation and Vapor Permeation.
Vane, Leland M;
Vol. 94 , No. 2 , pp. 343-365
275 views DOI Abstract
2016
empirical study on the feasibility of unisza’s staff cash waqf and its possible impact on human development in terengganu
;Yusuff Jelili Amuda;Murshamshul Kamariah Musa;Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 19-36
251 views DOI Abstract
2012
takaful agents’ roles in accordance with the quran and sunnah
;Marhanum Che Mohd Salleh;Nurdianawati Irwani Abdullah;Siti Salwani Razali;Saodah Wok
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 41-45
251 views DOI Abstract
2016
mentalist vs behaviorist : chomsky`s linguistic theory
;Solehah Yaacob
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 7-12
218 views DOI Abstract
2014
obsessive-compulsive disorder: its what and how from an islamic perspective
;Abdul Latif Abdul Razak
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 7-15
205 views DOI Abstract
2017
philanthropic commitment traits for waqf in higher education
;Siti Khadijah, A. M.;Muhammad Sabki, S.;Ismail, A.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 71-77
188 views DOI Abstract
2015
ellipsis and its translation from arabic into malay language: an analytical study
;Lubna Abd Rahman;Shamsul Jamili Yeob;Akmal Khuzairy Abdul Rahman
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 145-154
182 views DOI Abstract
2014
analisa eksistensi gharar terhadap perlaksanaan pembiayaan peribadi tawarruq
;Muhammad Mustakim Mohamed Noh;Siti Arni Basir;Wan Norhasniah Wan Husin
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 83-95
181 views DOI Abstract
2012
strategies and obstacles on educational policy of arabic language program
;Muhamadul, B.Y
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 91-98
176 views DOI Abstract
2014
sistem pengurusan kualiti menurut perspektif islam ms 1900 di institusi pengajian tinggi malaysia: suatu cabaran masa kini
;Hasan Al-Banna, M.;Ab. Mumin, A.G.;Siti Arni, B.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 101-115
167 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.