Indexed in Journament

nephrology dialysis transplantation

ISSN 0931-0509· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,651 of 29,298 scored journals (34,028 indexed)
146 Articles
Scores higher than 80.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name nephrology dialysis transplantation
ISSN 0931-0509

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 12.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 31.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for nephrology dialysis transplantation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation 12.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 6.2
Content Distribution 31.3 89.5
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (146)

2009
Adrenergic beta-1 receptor genetic variation predicts longitudinal rate of GFR decline in hypertensive nephrosclerosis
Vol. 24 , No. 12 , pp. 3677-3686
377 views DOI Abstract
2012
Diabetes - Experimental
Vol. 27 , No. suppl 2 , pp. ii159-ii166
248 views DOI Abstract
2009
Adrenergic beta-1 receptor genetic variation predicts longitudinal rate of GFR decline in hypertensive nephrosclerosis
Vol. 24 , No. 12 , pp. 3677-3686
236 views Abstract
2012
Bone and mineral metabolism after transplantation
Vol. 27 , No. suppl_2 , pp. ii8-ii8
195 views Abstract
2004
Foreword
98 views DOI
2003
Oxidative stress in end-stage renal disease: an emerging threat to patient outcome
93 views DOI Abstract
2008
Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis
78 views DOI Abstract
2026
Unmet Needs in the Management of Adult Patients with Lupus Nephritis
77 views DOI Abstract
2011
Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischaemia-reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury
71 views DOI Abstract
2026
Long-term cost-effectiveness of CKD screening in middle-aged adults
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Circular RNAs at the Crossroads of Inflammation, Fibrosis and Tissue Repair
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Pentoxifylline for chronic kidney disease in people with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Veterans Affairs Pentoxifylline in Diabetic Kidney Disease (VA PTXRx) Study: Baseline Characteristics
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Per-protocol repeat kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis: one more branch of the tree
8 views DOI
2026
C5 Inhibition for Anti-Cancer Therapy-Induced Renal Thrombotic Microangiopathy
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Stone Removal to Disease Management: Do the 2026 EAU Guidelines Call for a New Urology–Nephrology Partnership?
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recombinant shingles vaccination and the risk of cardiovascular events: association or causation?
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Aldosterone and Residual Cardiorenal Risk: Pathophysiology and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies
17 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,651 of 29,298 scored
(34,028 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

12.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

31.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.