Indexed in Journament

nephrology dialysis transplantation

ISSN 0931-0509· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,446 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
100 Articles
Scores higher than 33.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name nephrology dialysis transplantation
ISSN 0931-0509

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.2
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 12.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 11.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for nephrology dialysis transplantation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 12.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 11.3 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (100)

2009
Adrenergic beta-1 receptor genetic variation predicts longitudinal rate of GFR decline in hypertensive nephrosclerosis
Vol. 24 , No. 12 , pp. 3677-3686
332 views DOI Abstract
2012
Diabetes - Experimental
Vol. 27 , No. suppl 2 , pp. ii159-ii166
207 views DOI Abstract
2009
Adrenergic beta-1 receptor genetic variation predicts longitudinal rate of GFR decline in hypertensive nephrosclerosis
Vol. 24 , No. 12 , pp. 3677-3686
204 views Abstract
2012
Bone and mineral metabolism after transplantation
Vol. 27 , No. suppl_2 , pp. ii8-ii8
157 views Abstract
2004
Foreword
61 views DOI
2003
Oxidative stress in end-stage renal disease: an emerging threat to patient outcome
53 views DOI Abstract
2008
Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis
49 views DOI Abstract
2011
Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischaemia-reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury
45 views DOI Abstract
2026
Comparative Effectiveness of Combination Therapy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes mellitus Type 2 using Real World Data
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Serum levels of guanidinylated YB-1 indicate active lupus nephritis
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with lower kidney cancer risk after metabolic bariatric surgery
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Hepatic injury-induced remote kidney injury is associated with impaired hepatic clearance of cell-free hemoglobin
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Spatial and seasonal patterns of pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in France
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Longitudinal eGFR data in the estimation of missing baseline eGFR in patients with glomerular disease
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Trends in mortality in adult first kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes as cause of kidney failure: an ERA Registry study
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke: risk scores in the era of SGLT2i, non-steroidal MRA, and GLP-1 RA, and presence of high competing mortality
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
How to treat „FSGS“? A conceptual framework
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,446 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

12.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

11.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.