Indexed in Journament

national science review

ISSN 2095-5138· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.9 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #167 of 29,301 scored journals (34,035 indexed)
423 Articles
Scores higher than 99.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name national science review
ISSN 2095-5138

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 12.9
Content Distribution 59.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for national science review
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.6
Accessibility — 23.3
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 12.9 6.7
Content Distribution 59.3 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (423)

2026
2026
Global emission trends of anthropogenic full-volatility-range organic compounds 1970-2020
116 views DOI Abstract
2026
Scalable Fabrication of 12-inch Polycrystalline Diamond Membranes
114 views DOI Abstract
2017
An overview of multi-task learning
90 views DOI Abstract
2026
Topologically Plastic Reservoir Computing with Self-rectifying Memristor Arrays
88 views DOI Abstract
2026
Smart MOF separator towards long-cycling high-energy-density sodium-metal batteries
77 views DOI Abstract
2020
Enhanced secondary pollution offset reduction of primary emissions during COVID-19 lockdown in China
68 views DOI Abstract
2026
DexAnyTwist: Learning General Dexterous Twisting with Hybrid Manipulation System Identification
66 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular science vs. molecular medicine
65 views DOI Abstract
2026
Chiral phonons: lattice angular momentum and beyond
2 views DOI
2026
Climate Change Is Reshaping the Global Patterns of Infectious Disease
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Meta-state electrolytes with quasi-ordered clusters for stable lithium metal batteries
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Observation of a magneto-nonlinear Hall effect in an altermagnet candidate
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Orbital magnetization from parallel transport of Bloch states
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
An Asynchronous Neuromorphic Architecture for Wearable EEG Emotion Recognition
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Heterogeneous tandem catalysis for regioselective hydroaminomethylation of olefins to linear amines by a composite catalyst
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
High-order nanofluidic spiking encoding
12 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.9/100 · Average
Ranked #167 of 29,301 scored
(34,035 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.9/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.