Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4266 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Air Waste Manag Assoc
Abbreviated Name j air waste manag assoc
ISSN 2162-2906
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uawm20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2009
Adsorption kinetic, thermodynamic, and desorption studies of isopropyl alcohol vapor by oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes.
Hsu, Shih-Chieh;Lu, Chungsying;
Vol. 59 , No. 8 , pp. 990-7
402 views Abstract
2019
Greenhouse gas emission from small clinics solid waste management scenarios in an urban area of an underdeveloping country: A life cycle perspective.
Khan, Bilal Ahmed;Khan, Aves Ahmed;Ali, Mustafa;Cheng, Longsheng;
Vol. 69 , No. 7 , pp. 823-833
383 views DOI Abstract
2017
antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of ethanolic extracts of guarana, boldo, rosemary and cinnamon
;Jeannine Bonilla;Paulo Jose do Amaral Sobral
Vol. 20 , pp. -
379 views DOI Abstract
2016
Comparison of real-time instruments and gravimetric method when measuring particulate matter in a residential building.
Wang, Zuocheng;Calderón, Leonardo;Patton, Allison P;Sorensen Allacci, MaryAnn;Senick, Jennifer;Wener, Richard;Andrews, Clinton J;Mainelis, Gediminas;
Vol. 66 , No. 11 , pp. 1109-1120
348 views Abstract
2010
The recycling of comminuted glass-fiber-reinforced resin from electronic waste.
Duan, Huabo;Jia, Weifeng;Li, Jinhui;
Vol. 60 , No. 5 , pp. 532-9
339 views Abstract
2020
Concentration and size distribution of particulate matter in a new aviary system for laying hens in China.
Li, Zongyang;Wang, Chaoyuan;Li, Baoming;Shi, Zhengxiang;Zheng, Weichao;Teng, Guanghui;
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dominant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured at four growing facilities: pilot study results.
Samburova, Vera;McDaniel, Mark;Campbell, Dave;Wolf, Michael;Stockwell, William R;Khlystov, Andrey;
, pp. 1-10
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
A statistical model for predicting PM for the western United States.
Marsha, Amy;Larkin, Narasimhan K;
Vol. 69 , No. 10 , pp. 1215-1229
330 views DOI Abstract
2009
Replacement of hazardous chromium impregnating agent from silver/copper/chromium-impregnated active carbon using triethylenediamine to remove hydrogen sulfide, trichloromethane, ammonia, and sulfur dioxide.
Wu, Li-Chun;Chung, Ying-Chien;
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. 258-65
302 views Abstract
2013
Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.
Ollison, Will M;Crow, Walt;Spicer, Chester W;
Vol. 63 , No. 7 , pp. 855-63
300 views Abstract
View All 33 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.