Indexed in Journament

seminars in cancer biology

ISSN 1096-3650· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,029 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
136 Articles
Scores higher than 14.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name semin cancer biol
Abbreviated Name semin cancer biol
ISSN 1096-3650
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/seminars-in-cancer-biology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for seminars in cancer biology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 0.0 28.9
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 72.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (136)

2019
Estrogen receptor-mediated targeting of the extracellular matrix network in cancer.
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
Turning liabilities into opportunities: Off-target based drug repurposing in cancer.
421 views DOI Abstract
2015
mechanical relaxation of metallic glasses: an overview of experimental data and theoretical models
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 1073-1111
412 views DOI Abstract
2017
preparation and characterization of aminated hydroxyethyl cellulose-induced biomimetic hydroxyapatite coatings on the az31 magnesium alloy
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 214-
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nanomaterials multifunctional behavior for enlighten cancer therapeutics.
407 views DOI Abstract
2020
Overcoming immunotherapeutic resistance by targeting the cancer inflammation cycle.
379 views DOI Abstract
2017
tio2 nanotubes on ti dental implant. part 1: formation and aging in hank’s solution
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 167-
359 views DOI Abstract
2016
models to predict the viscosity of metal injection molding feedstock materials as function of their formulation
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 129-
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intracellular hyaluronan: Importance for cellular functions.
352 views DOI Abstract
2020
microstructure and mechanical evolution of cu-2.7be sheets via annealing
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 241-
184 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
effect of sign-alternating cyclic polarisation and hydrogen uptake on the localised corrosion of x70 pipeline steel in near-neutral solutions
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 245-
190 views DOI Abstract
2020
effect of roasting temperature on phase transformation in co-reduction roasting of nickel slag
Vol. 10 , No. 550 , pp. 550-
215 views DOI Abstract
2020
Turning liabilities into opportunities: Off-target based drug repurposing in cancer.
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Overcoming immunotherapeutic resistance by targeting the cancer inflammation cycle.
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Connections between metabolism and epigenetics in cancers.
Vol. 57 , pp. 52-58
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dietary flavonoids: Nano delivery and nanoparticles for cancer therapy.
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Statistical Genomics in Rare Cancer.
214 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,029 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.