Indexed in Journament

Journal of environmental quality

ISSN 1537-2537· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,217 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 58.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Environ Qual
Abbreviated Name j environ qual
ISSN 1537-2537
URL https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15372537

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 64.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.2
Content Distribution 64.7 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2005
Methods for speciation of metals in soils
D'amore, JJ;Al-Abed, SR;Scheckel, KG;Ryan, JA
Vol. 34 , No. 5 , pp. 1707-1745
390 views
Gene and antigen markers of shiga-toxin producing E. coli from Michigan and Indiana river water: occurrence and relation to recreational water quality criteria.
Duris, Joseph W;Haack, Sheridan K;Fogarty, Lisa R;
Vol. 38 , No. 5 , pp. 1878-86
361 views DOI Abstract
2011
a multi-faceted financial crisis
;Alessandro Roncaglia
Vol. 64 , No. 256 , pp. 3-5
338 views Abstract
Geographic relatedness and predictability of Escherichia coli along a peninsular beach complex of Lake Michigan.
Nevers, Meredith B;Shively, Dawn A;Kleinheinz, Gregory T;McDermott, Colleen M;Schuster, William;Chomeau, Vinni;Whitman, Richard L;
Vol. 38 , No. 6 , pp. 2357-64
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
Tree Species Suitability to Bioswales and Impact on the Urban Water Budget.
Scharenbroch, Bryant C;Morgenroth, Justin;Maule, Brian;
Vol. 45 , No. 1 , pp. 199-206
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Winter Phosphorus Release from Cover Crops and Linkages with Runoff Chemistry.
Cober, James R;Macrae, Merrin L;Van Eerd, Laura L;
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 907-914
311 views DOI Abstract
2002
cyclical patterns in profits, provisioning and lending of banks and procyclicality of the new basel capital requirements
;Jacob A. Bikker;Haixia Hu
Vol. 55 , No. 221 , pp. 143-175
310 views Abstract
1998
macroeconomic thought at the european commission in the 1970s: the first decade of the annual economic reports
;I. MAES
Vol. 51 , No. 207 , pp. 387-412
296 views Abstract
2021
Ammonia and nitrous oxide emission factors for excreta deposited by livestock and land-applied manure
van der Weerden TJ;Noble A;de Klein CAM;Hutchings N;Thorman RE;Alfaro MA;Amon B;Beltran I;Grace P;Hassouna M;Krol DJ;Leytem AB;Salazar F;Velthof GL;;
Vol. 50 , No. 5 , pp. -
290 views Abstract
2016
introduction. time for a new debate on europe
;Carlo D'Ippoliti
Vol. 69 , No. 279 , pp. 295-300
290 views DOI Abstract
2021
Ammonia and nitrous oxide emission factors for excreta deposited by livestock and land-applied manure
van der Weerden TJ;Noble A;de Klein CAM;Hutchings N;Thorman RE;Alfaro MA;Amon B;Beltran I;Grace P;Hassouna M;Krol DJ;Leytem AB;Salazar F;Velthof GL;;
Vol. 50 , No. 5 , pp. -
290 views Abstract
2020
Global Research Alliance N O chamber methodology guidelines: Recommendations for air sample collection, storage, and analysis.
Harvey, M J;Sperlich, P;Clough, T J;Kelliher, F M;McGeough, K L;Martin, R J;Moss, R;
Vol. 49 , No. 5 , pp. 1110-1125
145 views DOI Abstract
2019
Winter Phosphorus Release from Cover Crops and Linkages with Runoff Chemistry.
Cober, James R;Macrae, Merrin L;Van Eerd, Laura L;
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 907-914
311 views DOI Abstract
2018
when small-sized and non-innovating firms meet a crisis: evidence from the italian labour market
;Stefano Perri;Roberto Lampa
Vol. 71 , No. 284 , pp. 61-83
244 views DOI Abstract
2018
environment, effective demand, and cyclical growth in surplus labor economies
;Guilherme de Oliveira
Vol. 71 , No. 285 , pp. -
192 views Abstract
2017
explaining trade imbalances in the euro area: liquidity preference and the role of finance
;Hubert Gabrisch
Vol. 70 , No. 281 , pp. 155-184
96 views Abstract
2017
how much is ceo education worth to a firm? evidence from european firms
;Ottorino Morresi
Vol. 70 , No. 282 , pp. 311-353
217 views Abstract
2017
changes in wealth distribution in italy (2002-2012) and who gained from the great recession
;Ignazio Drudi;Giorgio Tassinari;Fabrizio Alboni
Vol. 70 , No. 281 , pp. 129-153
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
why does the productivity of investment vary across countries?
;Kevin S. Nell;A.P. Thirlwall
Vol. 70 , No. 282 , pp. 213-245
246 views Abstract
2016
Tree Species Suitability to Bioswales and Impact on the Urban Water Budget.
Scharenbroch, Bryant C;Morgenroth, Justin;Maule, Brian;
Vol. 45 , No. 1 , pp. 199-206
319 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,217 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.