cytogenetic and genome research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2255 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

cytogenetic and genome research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name cytogenet genome res
Abbreviated Name cytogenet genome res
ISSN 1424-859X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2017
Karyotypes and distribution of tandem repeat sequences in Brassica Nigra determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization
Wang G.
Vol. 152 , pp. 158-165
383 views DOI
2019
Unexpected Coexistence of a Derivative t(21;21) and Complementary Mosaic r(21) in a Female with Multiple Miscarriages.
Onur Cura, Duygu;Bora, Elcin;Ozkalayci, Hande;Kirbiyik, Ozgur;Kutbay, Yasar B;Ercal, Derya;Cankaya, Tufan;
Vol. 158 , No. 2 , pp. 83-87
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 46,XY Female with a 9p24.3p24.1 Deletion and a 8q24.11q24.3 Duplication: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Bruni, Valentina;Roppa, Katia;Scionti, Francesca;Apa, Rosalbina;Sestito, Simona;Di Martino, Maria T;Pensabene, Licia;Concolino, Daniela;
238 views DOI Abstract
2005
Identification of the sex-determining locus of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) on chromosome 2
C.G. Artieri,Leslie Mitchell,S.H.S. Ng,S.E. Parisotto,R.G. Danzmann,B. Hoyheim,R.B. Phillips,M. Morasch,B.F. Koop,W.S. Davidson;C.G. Artieri;Leslie Mitchell;S.H.S. Ng;S.E. Parisotto;R.G. Danzmann;B. Hoyheim;R.B. Phillips;M. Morasch;B.F. Koop;W.S. Davidson;
Vol. 112 , No. 1-2 , pp. 152-159
236 views DOI Abstract
2019
Familial 3-Way Balanced Translocation Causes 1q43→qter Loss and 10q25.2→qter Gain in a Severely Affected Male Toddler.
Córdova-Fletes, Carlos;Arámbula-Meraz, Eliakym;Zarazúa-Niño, Ana Itzel;Madueña-Molina, Jesús;Sáinz-Barraza, Marbella Elizabeth;González-García, Juan Ramón;León-León, Christian;López-López, Gabriel;Lugo-Guzmán, Efraín Guadalupe;Picos-Cárdenas, Verónica Judith;
Vol. 157 , No. 4 , pp. 231-238
230 views DOI Abstract
2013
metabolites change in jatropha plants due to seed treatment with rhizobacteria and rhizoctonia bataticola
;Surender Kumar;Sushil Sharma
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 389-396
230 views Abstract
2009
diversity and primary productivity of hill beech forests from doftana valley (romanian subcarpathians)
;Mihaela Paucã-Comãnescu;Marilena Onete;Vasile Sanda;Ioana Vicol;Ioana Onut;Daniela Mogâldea;Sorin Stefanut
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 63-76
223 views Abstract
2018
a comparison of two methods of data collection for modelling productivity of harvesters: manual time study and follow-up study using on-board-computer stem records
;Julia Brewer;Bruce Talbot;Helmer Belbo;Pierre Ackerman;Simon Ackerman
Vol. 61 , No. 1 , pp. 109-124
214 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Karyotype of Salvator merianae (Squamata, Teiidae): Analyses by Classical and Molecular Cytogenetic Techniques.
da Silva, Marcelo J;de Araújo Vieira, Ana P;Galvão Cipriano, Flávia M;Dos Santos Cândido, Maria R;de Oliveira, Edivaldo H C;Gimenez Pinheiro, Tamaris;da Silva, Edson L;
210 views DOI Abstract
2012
accuracy assessment of gps and surveying technique in forest road mapping
;Ehsan Abdi;Leila Goushbor;Saeed Rahbari Sisakht;Hamid Soufi
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 309-317
209 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.