environmental engineering science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#331 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

environmental engineering science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name environ eng sci
Abbreviated Name environ eng sci
ISSN 1092-8758
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.liebertonline.com/EES
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2018
Effect of Secondary Metabolites Present in Brassica nigra Root Exudates on Anthracene and Phenanthrene Degradation by Rhizosphere Microorganism
Garcés Mejía A.
Vol. 35 , pp. 203-209
374 views DOI
2019
A Drinking Water Relevant Water Chemistry Model for the Free Chlorine and Cyanuric Acid System from 5 to 35 °C.
Wahman, David G;Alexander, Matthew T;
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 283-294
297 views DOI Abstract
2017
natural rhizobial diversity helps to reveal genes and qtls associated with biological nitrogen fixation in common bean
;Olaya Muñoz-Azcarate;Ana M González;Marta Santalla
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 435-466
289 views DOI Abstract
2017
surface conditioning with <em>escherichia coli</em> cell wall components can reduce biofilm formation by decreasing initial adhesion
;Luciana C. Gomes;Joana M. R. Moreira;José D. P. Araújo;Filipe J. Mergulhão
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 613-628
258 views DOI Abstract
2016
the prevalence of foodborne pathogenic bacteria on cutting boards and their ecological correlation with background biota
;Natsumi Ishida;Kenji Sakai;Yukihiro Tashiro;Kosuke Tashiro;Toshinari Maeda;Yoshihito Shirai;Noor-Azira Abdul-Mutalib;Syafinaz Amin Nordin;Malina Osman;Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 138-151
249 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reliable model of reservoir water quality prediction based on improved ARIMA method
Wang, J.
Vol. 36 , pp. 1041-1048
232 views DOI
2017
beneficial effects of antioxidative lactic acid bacteria
;Hisako Nakagawa;Tadaaki Miyazaki
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
227 views DOI Abstract
2013
Unit Process Wetlands for Removal of Trace Organic Contaminants and Pathogens from Municipal Wastewater Effluents.
Jasper, Justin T;Nguyen, Mi T;Jones, Zackary L;Ismail, Niveen S;Sedlak, David L;Sharp, Jonathan O;Luthy, Richard G;Horne, Alex J;Nelson, Kara L;
Vol. 30 , No. 8 , pp. 421-436
224 views Abstract
2016
microbial mobilization of rare earth elements (ree) from mineral solids—a mini review
;Fabienne Barmettler;Claudio Castelberg;Carlotta Fabbri;Helmut Brandl
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 190-204
223 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of transcriptomes of enlarged spheroplasts of <em>erythrobacter litoralis</em> and <em>lelliottia amnigena</em>
;Sawako Takahashi;Ayana Takayanagi;Yurika Takahashi;Taku Oshima;Hiromi Nishida
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 152-189
196 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.