microchimica acta | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2929 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

microchimica acta

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name microchimica acta
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0026-3672
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/604
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2019
Determination of the activity of uracil-DNA glycosylase by using two-tailed reverse transcription PCR and gold nanoparticle-mediated silver nanocluster fluorescence: a new method for gene therapy-related enzyme detection
Zhang K.
Vol. 186 , pp. 0-0
430 views DOI
2019
Ultrasound assisted dispersive solid phase extraction of triazole fungicides by using an N-heterocyclic carbene copper complex supported on ionic liquid-modified graphene oxide as a sorbent
Aladaghlo, Z.
Vol. 186 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2008
Single drop microextraction combined with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of lead in biological samples
Liang, Pei;Liu, Rui;Cao, Jing
Vol. 160 , No. 1-2 , pp. 135-139
314 views
2019
An electrochemical immunosensor for the corona virus associated with the Middle East respiratory syndrome using an array of gold nanoparticle-modified carbon electrodes
Layqah, L.
Vol. 186 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2020
Net-like mesoporous carbon nanocomposites for magnetic solid-phase extraction of sulfonamides prior to their quantitation by UPLC-HRMS
Di, S.
Vol. 187 , pp. 0-0
297 views DOI
2019
Aptamer based ratiometric electrochemical sensing of 17β-estradiol using an electrode modified with gold nanoparticles, thionine, and multiwalled carbon nanotubes
Liu, X.
Vol. 186 , pp. 0-0
281 views DOI
2019
A copper(II)/cobalt(II) organic gel with enhanced peroxidase-like activity for fluorometric determination of hydrogen peroxide and glucose
Ting Ting Zhao;Zhong Wei Jiang;Shu Jun Zhen;Cheng Zhi Huang;Yuan Fang Li;Ting Ting Zhao;Zhong Wei Jiang;Shu Jun Zhen;Cheng Zhi Huang;Yuan Fang Li;
Vol. 186 , No. 3 , pp. 1-8
259 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel manganese(II)-based metal-organic gels: synthesis, characterization and application to chemiluminescent sensing of hydrogen peroxide and glucose
Jiaqi Yu;Mengya Cao;Hao Wang;Yongxin Li;Jiaqi Yu;Mengya Cao;Hao Wang;Yongxin Li;
Vol. 186 , No. 11 , pp. 1-8
234 views DOI Abstract
2019
A nanocomposite prepared from reduced graphene oxide, gold nanoparticles and poly(2-amino-5-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole) for use in an electrochemical sensor for doxorubicin
Ghanbari, M.
Vol. 186 , pp. 0-0
227 views DOI
2014
Mediatorless amperometric bienzyme glucose biosensor based on horseradish peroxidase and glucose oxidase cross-linked to multiwall carbon nanotubes
Shuxia Xu;Honglan Qi;Shiyi Zhou;Xinfeng Zhang;Chengxiao Zhang;Shuxia Xu;Honglan Qi;Shiyi Zhou;Xinfeng Zhang;Chengxiao Zhang;
Vol. 181 , No. 5 , pp. 535-541
219 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.