Biocontrol science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#385 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

Biocontrol science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Biocontrol Sci
Abbreviated Name biocontrol sci
ISSN 1884-0205
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (111 total)

2019
New Insight on Fumigation Action of Essential Oil, Commercial Fungicide and Low Oxygen Microenvironment on Museum Mold, Alternaria alternata.
Abdelrahman, Elamin;Takatori, Kosuke;Matsuda, Yasunori;Tsukada, Masahiko;Kirino, Fumiyoshi;
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 123-127
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kuma Bamboo Grass (Sasa veitchii) Extracts Exhibit Protective Effects Against Atypical Aeromonas salmonicida Infection in Goldfish (Carassius auratus).
Asakura, Hiroshi;Makino, Sou-Ichi;Watanabe, Kunitomo;Tuchida, Yuzo;Kawabe, Mitsuro;Sakurai, Daisuke;
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 145-154
269 views DOI Abstract
2007
physiological substantiation for the choice of the start formulas to feed a term infant, if there are contraindications to the breast feeding
;N.M. Bogdanova;E.M. Bulatova
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 91-100
249 views Abstract
2006
fore cast for scientific research development in pediatry for 2006–2010
;V.Yu. Al'bitsky;I.I. Balabolkin;A.A. Baranov;N.R. Belova;T.E. Borovik;I.K. Volkov;L.S Namazova
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 111-112
248 views Abstract
2016
Validation Study and Quality Assurance of Pharmaceutical Water, Waterborne Microorganisms and Endotoxins.
Shintani, Hideharu;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 203-214
243 views DOI Abstract
2008
clinical significance of intraluminal endoscopy in diagnostics of digestive tract diseases in children
;M.M. Lokhmatov;P.L. Shcherbakov
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 134-136
218 views Abstract
2011
results of retrospective observational study of adalimumab safety and efficacy in patients with juvenile arthritis and uveitis
;Е.I. Alexeeva;Е.V. Mitenko;Т.М. Bzarova;S.I. Valieva;А.М. Chomakhidze;K.B. Isaeva;Е.G. Chistyakova;R.V. Denisova;T.V. Sleptsova;Т.Yu. Polyaeva;А.N. Fetisova
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. -
215 views Abstract
2011
therapeutic and prophylactic effectiveness of topical immunomodulator in treatment of acute respiratory infections
;O. V. Shamsheva;N. N. Zvereva
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 73-76
192 views Abstract
2011
acute intestinal infections: therapeutical tactics in children
;A.N. Surkov
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. -
188 views Abstract
2008
treating children with bronchial asthma that is resistant to traditional drug therapy
;R.M. Torshkhoeva
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 143-144
182 views Abstract
View All 111 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.