proceedings - 2017 2nd international conferences on information technology, information systems and electrical engineering, icitisee 2017 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8082 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

proceedings - 2017 2nd international conferences on information technology, information systems and electrical engineering, icitisee 2017

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings - 2017 2nd international conferences on information technology, information systems and electrical engineering, icitisee 2017
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2018
Optimization the parameter of forecasting algorithm by using the genetical algorithm toward the information systems of geography for predicting the patient of dengue fever in district of sragen, Indonesia
Kristianto R.
Vol. 2018-January , pp. 45-50
449 views DOI
2018
diseño de un sistema inteligente y compacto de iluminación
;Daniel Francisco Lopez Fernandez;Daniel Mideros
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 226-235
280 views DOI Abstract
2013
contenido de compuestos antioxidantes en tres estados de maduración de tomate de árbol (solanum betaceum cav.) cultivado a diferentes alturas (m.s.n.m.) antioxidant compounds content in red-purple tree tomato grown at different altitudes (m.a.s.l.)
;Lorena Cuesta;María José Andrade Cuvi;Carlota Moreno Guerrero;Analía Concellón
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 32-49
250 views Abstract
2014
a mathematical model for reducing the composting time
;Estefanía Larreategui;Carlos Banchón
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 29-37
249 views Abstract
2012
estimación de la estabilidad de un sazonador a base de amaranto reventado y maní tostado, a partir del índice de peróxidos
;María Augusta Rosero;Elena Villacrés;Juan Bravo Vásquez
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 08-13
243 views Abstract
2016
implementation of lean manufacturing in a food enterprise
;Jorge Viteri Moya;Edison Matute Déleg;Cristina Viteri Sánchez;Nadya Rivera Vásquez
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
234 views Abstract
2017
potential native trees and shrubs for reforestation in the central sierra of ecuador
;Jorge Caranqui Aldaz
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 103-109
207 views DOI Abstract
2014
user interfaces based on touchless hand gestures for the classroom: a survey
;Orlando Erazo;Roberto Pico
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 34-53
191 views Abstract
2016
the simplex-centroid design and desirability function in optimizing the sensory acceptability of sweet bread enriched with chenopodium quinoa
;Raúl Siche;Víctor Aredo;Lía Velásquez;Israel Castillo
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 70-81
187 views Abstract
2016
design and implementation of a yagi microstrip antenna to 5.8 ghz
;Andrea Gordón;Ricardo Llugsi
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 96-110
187 views Abstract
View All 23 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.