Indexed in Journament

molecular biology and evolution

ISSN 1537-1719· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,203 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
245 Articles
Scores higher than 78.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name mol biol evol
Abbreviated Name mol biol evol
ISSN 1537-1719
URL http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 15.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for molecular biology and evolution
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 12.1 13.4
Content Distribution 15.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (245)

2007
PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood
Vol. 24 , No. 8 , pp. -
433 views Abstract
2003
Recent duplication of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) genome as revealed by analyses of microsatellite loci
Vol. 20 , No. 9 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2012
physicians’ perceptions and adherence to guidelines for the management of hypertension: a national, multicentre, prospective study
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
408 views DOI Abstract
2015
Mitogenomic Meta-Analysis Identifies Two Phases of Migration in the History of Eastern Eurasian Sheep.
Vol. 32 , No. 10 , pp. 2515-33
406 views DOI Abstract
2006
Robustness of coalescent estimators to between-lineage mutation rate variation.
Vol. 23 , No. 12 , pp. 2355-60
377 views Abstract
2019
The Genome Landscape of Tibetan Sheep Reveals Adaptive Introgression from Argali and the History of Early Human Settlements on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 283-303
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
The current genomic landscape of western South America: Andes, Amazonia and Pacific Coast.
341 views DOI Abstract
2003
Recent Duplication of the Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Genome as Revealed by Analyses of Microsatellite Loci
Vol. 20 , No. 9 , pp. 1425-1434
283 views Abstract
2026
Variant calling in non-model organisms with snpArcher
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Adaptation to seasonal drought in Arabis alpina is linked to the demographic history and climatic changes since the last glacial maximum
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Consistent and idiosyncratic pleiotropy in shaping genetic correlations
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Phylogenomic subsampling and upsampling for efficient evolutionary analyses of big data
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
EZmito2: a tool suite for mitochondrial genome dataset preparation, population genetics, and visualization
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
On the Origin of Animals and Placental Mammals: A Critique of Literalist Readings of the Fossil Record
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Redesign of energetically frustrated regions rescues function in defective T4 clamp loaders
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Identification and Masking of Artefactual and Misleading Within-Host Variants in Deep-Sequencing SARS-CoV-2 Data
9 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,203 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

15.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.