molecular biology and evolution | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2843 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

molecular biology and evolution

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name mol biol evol
Abbreviated Name mol biol evol
ISSN 1537-1719
Aim and Scope
URL http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (198 total)

2007
PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood
Yang Z;;
Vol. 24 , No. 8 , pp. -
386 views Abstract
2003
Recent duplication of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) genome as revealed by analyses of microsatellite loci
David L;Blum S;Feldman MW;Lavi U;Hillel J;;
Vol. 20 , No. 9 , pp. -
381 views Abstract
2012
physicians’ perceptions and adherence to guidelines for the management of hypertension: a national, multicentre, prospective study
;Mamas Theodorou;Panagiotis Stafylas;Georgia Kourlaba;Daphne Kaitelidou;Nikos Maniadakis;Vasilios Papademetriou
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
379 views DOI Abstract
2015
Mitogenomic Meta-Analysis Identifies Two Phases of Migration in the History of Eastern Eurasian Sheep.
Lv, Feng-Hua;Peng, Wei-Feng;Yang, Ji;Zhao, Yong-Xin;Li, Wen-Rong;Liu, Ming-Jun;Ma, Yue-Hui;Zhao, Qian-Jun;Yang, Guang-Li;Wang, Feng;Li, Jin-Quan;Liu, Yong-Gang;Shen, Zhi-Qiang;Zhao, Sheng-Guo;Hehua, Eer;Gorkhali, Neena A;Farhad Vahidi, S M;Muladno, Muhammad;Naqvi, Arifa N;Tabell, Jonna;Iso-Touru, Terhi;Bruford, Michael W;Kantanen, Juha;Han, Jian-Lin;Li, Meng-Hua;
Vol. 32 , No. 10 , pp. 2515-33
363 views DOI Abstract
2006
Robustness of coalescent estimators to between-lineage mutation rate variation.
Kuhner, Mary K;
Vol. 23 , No. 12 , pp. 2355-60
353 views Abstract
2020
Extreme genomic CpG deficiency in SARS-CoV-2 and evasion of host antiviral defense.
Xia, Xuhua;
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Genome Landscape of Tibetan Sheep Reveals Adaptive Introgression from Argali and the History of Early Human Settlements on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
Hu, Xiao-Ju;Yang, Ji;Xie, Xing-Long;Lv, Feng-Hua;Cao, Yin-Hong;Li, Wen-Rong;Liu, Ming-Jun;Wang, Yu-Tao;Li, Jin-Quan;Liu, Yong-Gang;Ren, Yan-Lin;Shen, Zhi-Qiang;Wang, Feng;Hehua, EEr;Han, Jian-Lin;Li, Meng-Hua;
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 283-303
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
The current genomic landscape of western South America: Andes, Amazonia and Pacific Coast.
Barbieri, Chiara;Barquera, Rodrigo;Arias, Leonardo;Sandoval, José R;Acosta, Oscar;Zurita, Camilo;Aguilar-Campos, Abraham;Tito-Álvarez, Ana M;Serrano-Osuna, Ricardo;Gray, Russell;Mafessoni, Fabrizio;Heggarty, Paul;Shimizu, Kentaro K;Fujita, Ricardo;Stoneking, Mark;Pugach, Irina;Fehren-Schmitz, Lars;
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Treeio: An R Package for Phylogenetic Tree Input and Output with Richly Annotated and Associated Data
Wang, L.G.
Vol. 37 , pp. 599-603
252 views DOI
2020
Living Trees: High-Quality Reproducible and Reusable Construction of Bacterial Phylogenetic Trees
Hu, D.
Vol. 37 , pp. 563-575
251 views DOI
View All 198 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
100
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.