Robustness of coalescent estimators to between-lineage mutation rate variation.

Clicks: 398
ID: 905
2006
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 266 articles by views in molecular biology and evolution

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 266 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Data from HIV and from human neoplastic cells can show substantial between-lineage mutation rate variation even within a single population. Such variation may affect estimators of population quantities such as Theta = 4N(e)mu. Using simulated DNA data, I measured the effect of rate variation on recovery of Theta by the summary-statistic estimator of Watterson (Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical systems without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7:256-276) and the coalescent maximum likelihood algorithm LAMARC (Kuhner MK. 2006. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics. Advance Access doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk051). Watterson's estimator showed a downward bias, as expected, with high values of Theta. LAMARC's mean estimate was accurate for all tested values of Theta and rate variation except for a downward bias when rate variation was maximal (i.e., the slow rate was zero). LAMARC had consistently narrower confidence intervals (CIs) than Watterson's estimator. Both methods tended to reject the truth too often when rate variation was 8x or greater and independent among branches, as well as when variation was 4x or greater and correlated among branches. In the case of Watterson's estimate, this excess rejection was fully attributable to variation among genealogies in the amount of total branch length associated with the fast and slow rates. However, in the case of LAMARC, some excess rejection was still observed even when between-genealogy variation was taken into account. Both estimators are robust to modest rate variation; however, their use should be coupled with a statistical test to rule out extreme rate variation as the resulting CIs may not be reliable.
Reference Key
kuhner2006robustness Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kuhner, Mary K;
Journal molecular biology and evolution
Year 2006
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.