deutsche zeitschrift fur philosophie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#438 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

deutsche zeitschrift fur philosophie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim ahci
Short Name deutsche zeitschrift fur philosophie
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0012-1045
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.akademie-verlag.de/olb/de/1.c.335299.de
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2016
microfluidic platform for electrophysiological recordings from host-stage hookworm and ascaris suum larvae: a new tool for anthelmintic research
;Janis C. Weeks;William M. Roberts;Kristin J. Robinson;Melissa Keaney;Jon J. Vermeire;Joseph F. Urban Jr.;Shawn R. Lockery;John M. Hawdon
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 314-328
324 views DOI Abstract
2014
schistosome abc multidrug transporters: from pharmacology to physiology
;Robert M. Greenberg
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 301-309
306 views DOI Abstract
2014
The theory of multicultural civil rights also opens an exciting perspective on the issue of animal rights: Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka interviewed by Hilal Sezgin
Donaldson S.
Vol. 62 , pp. 108-119
305 views DOI
2016
effects of a novel β–lapachone derivative on trypanosoma cruzi: parasite death involving apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis
;Danielle Oliveira dos Anjos;Eliomara Sousa Sobral Alves;Vinicius Tomaz Gonçalves;Sheila Suarez Fontes;Mateus Lima Nogueira;Ana Márcia Suarez-Fontes;João Batista Neves da Costa;Fabricio Rios-Santos;Marcos André Vannier-Santos
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 207-219
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
kinetic profiling an abundantly expressed planarian serotonergic gpcr identifies bromocriptine as a perdurant antagonist
;John D. Chan;Thomas Grab;Jonathan S. Marchant
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 356-363
285 views DOI Abstract
2018
an automated high-throughput system for phenotypic screening of chemical libraries on c. elegans and parasitic nematodes
;Frederick A. Partridge;Anwen E. Brown;Steven D. Buckingham;Nicky J. Willis;Graham M. Wynne;Ruth Forman;Kathryn J. Else;Alison A. Morrison;Jacqueline B. Matthews;Angela J. Russell;David A. Lomas;David B. Sattelle
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 8-21
262 views Abstract
2014
repurposing drugs for the treatment and control of helminth infections
;Gordana Panic;Urs Duthaler;Benjamin Speich;Jennifer Keiser
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 185-200
258 views DOI Abstract
2019
Critical metaphysics or analytical hermeneutics?: About the readability of things and the a priori presuppositions of reference
Koch, A.
Vol. 67 , pp. 118-131
238 views DOI
2015
in vitro flubendazole-induced damage to vital tissues in adult females of the filarial nematode brugia malayi
;Maeghan O'Neill;James F. Geary;Dalen W. Agnew;Charles D. Mackenzie;Timothy G. Geary
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 135-140
233 views DOI Abstract
2015
drug resistance analysis by next generation sequencing in leishmania
;Philippe Leprohon;Christopher Fernandez-Prada;Élodie Gazanion;Rubens Monte-Neto;Marc Ouellette
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 26-35
224 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.