renewable energy technologies for water desalination | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4356 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
28
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

renewable energy technologies for water desalination

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name renewable energy technologies for water desalination
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2017
efficacy of botulinum toxin b injection for raynaud’s phenomenon and digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis
;Sei-ichiro Motegi;Akihito Uehara;Kazuya Yamada;Akiko Sekiguchi;Chisako Fujiwara;Sayaka Toki;Yuki Date;Tetsuya Nakamura;Osamu Ishikawa
Vol. 97 , No. 7 , pp. 843-850
274 views DOI Abstract
2017
suicidal ideation in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a german cross-sectional study
;Jan Dieris-Hirche;Uwe Gieler;Frank Petrak;Wolfgang Milch;Bert te Wildt;Barbara Dieris;Stephan Herpertz
Vol. 97 , No. 10 , pp. 1189-1195
262 views DOI Abstract
2018
early relief of pruritus in atopic dermatitis with crisaborole ointment, a non-steroidal, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor
;Gil Yosipovitch;Linda F. Gold;Mark G. Lebwohl;Jonathan I. Silverberg;Anna M. Tallman;Lee T. Zane
Vol. 98 , No. 5 , pp. 484-489
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
granuloma annulare and morphea: correlation with borrelia burgdorferi infections and chlamydia-related bacteria
;Lauri Tolkki;Kati Hokynar;Seppo Meri;Jaana Panelius;Mirja Puolakkainen;Annamari Ranki
Vol. 98 , No. 3 , pp. 355-360
240 views DOI Abstract
2018
predictive model for response rate to narrowband ultraviolet b phototherapy in vitiligo: a retrospective cohort study of 579 patients
;Raúl Cabrera;Lia Hojman;Francisca Recule;Rodrigo Sepulveda;Iris Delgado
Vol. 98 , No. 4 , pp. 416-420
229 views DOI Abstract
2017
morbidity and causes of death in patients with cutaneous t-cell lymphoma in finland
;Liisa Väkevä;Tuomas Lipsanen;Harri Sintonen;Annamari Ranki
Vol. 97 , No. 6 , pp. 735-738
223 views DOI Abstract
2018
classical hand, foot and mouth disease replaced by atypical hand, foot and mouth disease
;Regina Fölster-Holst
Vol. 98 , No. 3 , pp. 303-303
210 views DOI
2018
sarcoidal foreign body reaction as a severe side-effect to permanent makeup: successful treatment with intralesional triamcinolone
;Jörg Tittelbach;Melanie Peckruhn;Sibylle Schliemann;Peter Elsner
Vol. 98 , No. 4 , pp. 458-459
182 views DOI
2017
light chain deposition disease with bullous skin lesions mimicking atypical bullous pemphigoid
;Marion Malphettes;Pauline Bonnet;Pierre Schneider;Marguerite Vignon;Marine Baron;Jean-David Bouaziz;Maxime Battistella
Vol. 98 , No. 1 , pp. 140-141
172 views DOI
2017
dystrophic calcification in a patient with primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis: an uncommon ultrasound finding
;Sergi Planas-Ciudad;Esther Roé Crespo;Juan Francisco Mir-Bonafé;Fania Zamantta Muñoz-Garza;Luis Puig
Vol. 98 , No. 1 , pp. 144-145
160 views DOI
View All 25 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
28
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

27.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.