BMC cancer | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2007 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

BMC cancer

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name BMC Cancer
Abbreviated Name bmc cancer
ISSN 1471-2407
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmccancer
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (44 total)

2007
Novel markers for differentiation of lobular and ductal invasive breast carcinomas by laser microdissection and microarray analysis
Josef, Srovnal;Jozef, Skarda;Eduard, Fridman;Jiri, Klein;Jiri, Ehrmann;Marta, Dziechciarkova;Wenbin, Wei;Karl, Baumforth;Jan, Bouchal;Gulisa, Turashvili;Marian, Hajduch;Paul, Murray;Zdenek, Kolar;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 55-
674 views Abstract
2018
PIK3CA mutation is a favorable prognostic factor in esophageal cancer: molecular profile by next-generation sequencing using surgically resected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue
Yokota, Tomoya;Serizawa, Masakuni;Hosokawa, Ayumu;Kusafuka, Kimihide;Mori, Keita;Sugiyama, Toshiro;Tsubosa, Yasuhiro;Koh, Yasuhiro;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
480 views Abstract
2018
Health utility scores of family caregivers for leukemia patients measured by EQ-5D-3L: a cross-sectional survey in China
Yu, Hongjuan;Zhang, Huan;Yang, Jinjin;Liu, Chaojie;Lu, Chengfang;Yang, Hongbin;Huang, Weidong;Zhou, Jin;Fu, Wenqi;Shi, Linmei;Yan, Yan;Liu, Guoxiang;Li, Limin;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
471 views Abstract
2017
Effects of aspirin and non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
Veettil, Sajesh K.;Lim, Kean Ghee;Ching, Siew Mooi;Saokaew, Surasak;Phisalprapa, Pochamana;Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
412 views Abstract
2018
Performance of a DNA methylation marker panel using liquid-based cervical scrapes to detect cervical cancer and its precancerous stages.
Schmitz, Martina;Eichelkraut, Kristin;Schmidt, Dana;Zeiser, Ilona;Hilal, Ziad;Tettenborn, Zena;Hansel, Alfred;Ikenberg, Hans;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1197
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Advancing interdisciplinary research in head and neck cancer through a multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study: The NETherlands QUality of life and BIomedical Cohort (NET-QUBIC) data warehouse and biobank
Verdonck-De, Leeuw I.
Vol. 19 , pp. 0-0
404 views DOI
2019
Are social inequalities in acute myeloid leukemia survival explained by differences in treatment utilization? Results from a French longitudinal observational study among older patients.
Berger, Eloïse;Delpierre, Cyrille;Despas, Fabien;Bertoli, Sarah;Bérard, Emilie;Bombarde, Oriane;Bories, Pierre;Sarry, Audrey;Laurent, Guy;Récher, Christian;Lamy, Sébastien;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 883
391 views DOI Abstract
2012
Metformin efficacy and safety for colorectal polyps: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
Takuma, Higurashi;Hirokazu, Takahashi;Hiroki, Endo;Kunihiro, Hosono;Eiji, Yamada;Hidenori, Ohkubo;Eiji, Sakai;Takashi, Uchiyama;Yasuo, Hata;Nobutaka, Fujisawa;Shiori, Uchiyama;Akiko, Ezuka;Hajime, Nagase;Takaomi, Kessoku;Nobuyuki, Matsuhashi;Shoji, Yamanaka;Yoshiaki, Inayama;Satoshi, Morita;Atsushi, Nakajima;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 118-
378 views Abstract
2019
Smoking cessation care can translate to lower hazard of death in the short-run in cancer patients - A retrospective cohort study to demonstrate the value of smoking cessation services within the treatment phase of cancer
Hawari, F.
Vol. 19 , pp. 0-0
372 views DOI
2018
Protocol for a phase III RCT and economic analysis of two exercise delivery methods in men with PC on ADT.
Alibhai, Shabbir M H;Ritvo, Paul;Santa Mina, Daniel;Sabiston, Catherine;Krahn, Murray;Tomlinson, George;Matthew, Andrew;Lukka, Himu;Warde, Padraig;Durbano, Sara;O'Neill, Meagan;Culos-Reed, S Nicole;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1031
371 views DOI Abstract
View All 44 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.