Indexed in Journament

annals of surgery

ISSN 1528-1140· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,254 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 78.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé ann surg
Nom Abrégé ann surg
ISSN 1528-1140
URL https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/default.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for annals of surgery
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 61.1 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 8.6 11.5
Content Distribution 74.3 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2018
the reliability and validity of behavior rating inventory of executive functions tool teacher’s form among iranian primary school students
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 25-34
541 views Abstract
2020
Worse Than Death: Survey of Public Perceptions of Disability Outcomes After Hypothetical Traumatic Brain Injury.
539 views DOI Abstract
1979
Prophylactic and preventive antibiotic therapy: timing, duration and economics
Vol. 189 , No. 6 , pp. -
539 views Abstract
2017
comprehensive needs assessment study and deployment of qfd targeted at new wheelchair design
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 377-388
476 views Abstract
2015
the performance of bilingual and monolingual children on working memory tasks
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 54-58
463 views Abstract
2015
independent and social living skills training for people with schizophrenia in iran: a randomized controlled trial
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 84-88
440 views Abstract
2019
Histopathologic Predictors of Survival and Recurrence in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: International Multicenter Cohort Study.
437 views DOI Abstract
2009
Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections: results from the Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Errors
Vol. 250 , No. 1 , pp. -
417 views Abstract
2019
Outcomes of Elective and Emergency Conversion in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study.
403 views DOI Abstract
2014
the effect of rehabilitation method based on existential approach and olson\'s model on marital satisfaction
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 12-17
399 views Abstract
2020
Portable Automated Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections Using Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation.
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Early Identification of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy: Development and Validation of a Multivariable Risk Prediction Model.
255 views DOI Abstract
2020
Worse Than Death: Survey of Public Perceptions of Disability Outcomes After Hypothetical Traumatic Brain Injury.
539 views DOI Abstract
2019
Outcomes of Elective and Emergency Conversion in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study.
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Severe Hypocalcemia After Thyroidectomy: An Analysis of 7366 Patients.
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Minor Hepatectomies: Focusing a Blurred Picture: Analysis of the Outcome of 4471 Open Resections in Patients Without Cirrhosis.
Vol. 270 , No. 5 , pp. 842-851
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pressure Injury.
232 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,254 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.