annals of surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#534 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

annals of surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name ann surg
Abbreviated Name ann surg
ISSN 1528-1140
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2018
the reliability and validity of behavior rating inventory of executive functions tool teacher’s form among iranian primary school students
;Malahat Amani;Roghaye Asady Gandomani;Abbas Nesayan
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 25-34
490 views Abstract
2020
Worse Than Death: Survey of Public Perceptions of Disability Outcomes After Hypothetical Traumatic Brain Injury.
Wilson, Jo Ellen;Shinall, Myrick C;Leath, Taylor C;Wang, Li;Harrell, Frank E;Wilson, Laura D;Nordness, Mina F;Rakhit, Shayan;de Riesthal, Michael R;Duff, Melissa C;Pandharipande, Pratik P;Patel, Mayur B;
480 views DOI Abstract
1979
Prophylactic and preventive antibiotic therapy: timing, duration and economics
Stone HH;Haney BB;Kolb LD;Geheber CE;Hooper CA;;
Vol. 189 , No. 6 , pp. -
469 views Abstract
2017
comprehensive needs assessment study and deployment of qfd targeted at new wheelchair design
;Sumit Desai;Shankar Mantha;Vikas Phalle
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 377-388
423 views Abstract
2015
the performance of bilingual and monolingual children on working memory tasks
;Faezeh Asadollahpour;Kowsar Baghban;Parisa Mirbalouchzehi
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 54-58
419 views Abstract
2019
Histopathologic Predictors of Survival and Recurrence in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: International Multicenter Cohort Study.
Moekotte, Alma L;Lof, Sanne;Van Roessel, Stijn;Fontana, Martina;Dreyer, Stephan;Shablak, Alaaeldin;Casciani, Fabio;Mavroeidis, Vasileios K;Robinson, Stuart;Khalil, Khalid;Gradinariu, George;Mowbray, Nicholas;Al-Sarireh, Bilal;Fusai, Giuseppe Kito;Roberts, Keith;White, Steve;Soonawalla, Zahir;Jamieson, Nigel B;Salvia, Roberto;Besselink, Marc G;Abu Hilal, Mohammed;
399 views DOI Abstract
2015
independent and social living skills training for people with schizophrenia in iran: a randomized controlled trial
;Ashraf Karbalaee-Nouri;Ali Hosseini;Ahmad Hajebi;Hasan Rafii;Abbas Motevalian
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 84-88
392 views Abstract
2009
Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections: results from the Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Errors
Steinberg JP;Braun BI;Hellinger WC;Kusek L;Bozikis MR;Bush AJ;Dellinger EP;Burke JP;Simmons B;Kritchevsky SB; ;;
Vol. 250 , No. 1 , pp. -
363 views Abstract
2014
the effect of rehabilitation method based on existential approach and olson\'s model on marital satisfaction
;Maedeh Naghiyaee;Bahman Bahmani;Ali Ghanbari Motlagh;Bijhan Khorasani;Aida Dehkhoda;Fahime alimohamadi
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 12-17
352 views Abstract
2015
the effect of rtms with rehabilitation on hand function and corticomotor excitability in sub-acute stroke
;Heidar Saadati;Iraj Abdollahi;Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei;Mojtaba Azimian;Hadi Motamedi;Akbar Biglarian;Alireza Rezvani
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 46-52
340 views Abstract
View All 50 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.