Indexed in Journament

the british journal of surgery

ISSN 1365-2168· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.1/100
Journament Score
#3,448
Journament Rank
169
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name br j surg
Abbreviated Name br j surg
ISSN 1365-2168
URL http://www.bjs.co.uk

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (169)

2020
COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis.
Spinelli, A;Pellino, G;
431 views DOI
2019
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.
, ;
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. e103-e112
376 views DOI Abstract
2012
effect of growth rate on wood specific gravity of three alternative timber species in sri lanka; swietenia macrophylla, khaya senegalensis and paulownia fortunei
;Priyan Perera;Hiran Amarasekera;N.D.R. Weerawardena
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
375 views Abstract
2019
Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
van der Poel, M J;Barkhatov, L;Fuks, D;Berardi, G;Cipriani, F;Aljaiuossi, A;Lainas, P;Dagher, I;D'Hondt, M;Rotellar, F;Besselink, M G;Aldrighetti, L;Troisi, R I;Gayet, B;Edwin, B;Abu Hilal, M;
374 views DOI Abstract
1977
The treatment of acute superficial abscesses: a prospective clinical trial
Macfie J;Harvey J;;
Vol. 64 , No. 4 , pp. -
368 views Abstract
1981
Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of subcutaneous abscesses
Ghoneim AT;McGoldrick J;Blick PW;Flowers MW;Marsden AK;Wilson DH;;
Vol. 68 , No. 7 , pp. -
362 views Abstract
2019
Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.
James, H K;Chapman, A W;Pattison, G T R;Griffin, D R;Fisher, J D;
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems.
Lu, J;Zhao, Y J;Zhou, Y;He, Q;Tian, Y;Hao, H;Qiu, X;Jiang, L;Zhao, G;Huang, C-M;, ;
Vol. 107 , No. 3 , pp. 248-257
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Safety of hospital discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery.
, ;
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.
, ;
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. e103-e112
294 views DOI Abstract
2026
Immunotherapy in the surgical patient: Perioperative considerations
Nicola McShane, Ciarán Hurley, Róisín Dolan
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Anal pain – Outpatient management
Harald Rosén, C Sebesta
DOI
2026
Explaining increased locoregional failure following TNT in RAPIDO
P J Nilsson, I Prata, M D Tanaka, A M Couwenberg, B van Etten, G A P Hospers, B Glimelius, C J H van de Velde
DOI Abstract
2026
Short-term economic impact of early leaks following metabolic bariatric surgery
José M. Balibrea, Javier Osorio, Joaquín Resa, M E Vilar Alvarez, Mireya Robles-Plaza, Julen Monje, Miguel Ángel Casado, Laura Salinas-Ortega
DOI Abstract
2026
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Masculinizing Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery: Validation of the GENDER-Q Chest Scales
Caleb Haley, Shane D Morrison, Manraj N Kaur, Charlene Rae, Megan Lane, Danny A. Young‐Afat, Tim C. van de Grift, Nicola R. Dean, Kathleen Armstrong, Devin Coon, Zac A. Cannell, Christian X. Lava, Sylvie D. Cornacchi, Alexis Laungani, Margriet G. Mullender, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Lotte Poulsen, Jack G. Graesser, Thomas Satterwhite, Allison C. Hu, Gerhard S. Mundinger, Hilliard T. Brydges, Jessica Hsu, Blair R. Peters, Jens U. Berli, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Nargis Kalia, Rachel Bluebond‐Langner, Oren Ganor, Alireza Hamidian Jahromi, Bashar Hassan, F Y Liang, John Henry Pang, Edward Ray, Gabriel A. Del Corral, K S Fan, Lily R. Mundy, Andrea L. Pusic, Anne F. Klassen
DOI Abstract
2026
Making the OR work: a socio-material study of ergonomics in the operating room
Alexis Mah, Csilla Kalocsai, Fahad Alam, Allia Karim, Jeremie Larouche, M Susan Hallbeck, Tara Cohen, Anna Ding, Jessica Armah, Julie Hallet, James D. Helman, Pablo Pérez d’Empaire, Chris Idestrup, Marie-Antonette Dandal, Agnes Ryzynski, Susan DeSousa
DOI Abstract
2026
A randomized, noninferiority clinical trial of Single-Shot Intrathecal Morphine versus Continuous Wound Infiltration for postoperative pain control after open pancreatoduodenectomy
Soohyuk Yoon, Taeyup Kim, Ho‐Jin Lee, Nanhee Park, Hye‐Sol Jung, Y S Cho, Wooil Kwon, Joon Seong Park, Chul-Woo Jung, Jin‐Young Jang
DOI Abstract
2026
Trimester-Specific Safety of Laparoscopic versus Open Abdominal Surgery During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Siran Wan, Wei Lin, Xi Zhang, Saidi Hu, Chenchen Luo, Shunhong Zhang, Elaine dos Ramos Amado dos Ramos, Lucilia Fernandes de Almeida, Lin-Yong Zhao
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Gut Microbiome in Surgical Oncology: Mechanisms, Perioperative Outcomes, and Therapeutic Opportunities
Jerry T. Dang, Yung Lee, Mélissa V Wills, J. Mark Brown, Karen Madsen, Valentin Mocanu
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Patient-led, home-based follow-up for colorectal cancer: the DISTANCE multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial
M H Elise van Driel, Hidde Swartjes, Jobbe Lemmens, Seyed M. Qaderi, Steven Teerenstra, J H Custers, Mg Elferink, Bob J. van Wely, J G Bloemen, Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein, Peter van Duijvendijk, Emiel G G Verdaasdonk, Marnix A J de Roos, Veerle M H Coupé, Geraldine R. Vink, Cornelis Verhoef, Dirk J. Grünhagen, Johannes H.W. de Wilt
DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
90
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.