Indexed in Journament

the british journal of surgery

ISSN 1365-2168· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
47.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #182 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
432 Articles
Scores higher than 99.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name br j surg
Abbreviated Name br j surg
ISSN 1365-2168
URL http://www.bjs.co.uk

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 100.0 12.6
Diversity 88.9 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 12.1 9.7
Content Distribution 6.9 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (432)

2020
COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis.
Spinelli, A;Pellino, G;
477 views DOI
2012
effect of growth rate on wood specific gravity of three alternative timber species in sri lanka; swietenia macrophylla, khaya senegalensis and paulownia fortunei
;Priyan Perera;Hiran Amarasekera;N.D.R. Weerawardena
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
415 views Abstract
1977
The treatment of acute superficial abscesses: a prospective clinical trial
Macfie J;Harvey J;;
Vol. 64 , No. 4 , pp. -
413 views Abstract
2019
Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.
James, H K;Chapman, A W;Pattison, G T R;Griffin, D R;Fisher, J D;
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
van der Poel, M J;Barkhatov, L;Fuks, D;Berardi, G;Cipriani, F;Aljaiuossi, A;Lainas, P;Dagher, I;D'Hondt, M;Rotellar, F;Besselink, M G;Aldrighetti, L;Troisi, R I;Gayet, B;Edwin, B;Abu Hilal, M;
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.
, ;
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. e103-e112
397 views DOI Abstract
1981
Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of subcutaneous abscesses
Ghoneim AT;McGoldrick J;Blick PW;Flowers MW;Marsden AK;Wilson DH;;
Vol. 68 , No. 7 , pp. -
386 views Abstract
2020
Safety of hospital discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery.
, ;
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems.
Lu, J;Zhao, Y J;Zhou, Y;He, Q;Tian, Y;Hao, H;Qiu, X;Jiang, L;Zhao, G;Huang, C-M;, ;
Vol. 107 , No. 3 , pp. 248-257
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.
, ;
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. e103-e112
329 views DOI Abstract
2026
Dehiscence, Infection, Seroma, Haematoma (DISH): Development and Validation of a New Classification of Surgical Site Outcomes
Giles Bond‐Smith, Marja A. Boermeester, David Leaper, Philip L. Russo, Antonia F Chen, the SSO Working Group Authors, Walter Danker, Najmuddin Gunja, Anastasia Ermakova, Nikolaos Takatzoglou, Cindy Tong, A Pashley, Jessica Albutt, Alexandra Yoe, the SSO Validation Study Panel, Thomas Aubert, Toms Augustin, Emre Balık, Tomasz Banasiewicz, Jayme Bennetts, Mujahid Bukhari, Marco Catarci, Mírian de Freitas Dal Ben Corradi, Eva Deerenberg, Christian Eckmann, Dario E Garin, Jignesh Gandhi, Bijie Hu, HyungJin Kim, Hayato Kurihara, Suk-Hwan Lee, Varut Lohsiriwat, Christian Macutkiewicz, Najjia Mahmoud, Keita Morikane, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Manuel Novajas, Federico Nuñez, Ibrahim Obeid, Caroline E. Reinke, Christine H Rohde, Ines Rubio-Perez, Esther A Saguil, Mauro J Salles, Angela Tecson, Jason Wellen, Yinmo Yang, the SSO Validation Study Panel, Yalda Afshar, Nitin Agarwal, Derek Amanatullah, Yaniss Belaroussi, Elias Castel, Alejandro Bolio Cerdán, Chong-Bum Chang, Patrick Charlebois, Paul Deramo, Federico Gorganchian, Shiki Fujino, Raj Gajbhiye, Zoilo Madrazo Gonzalez, Peter Graves, Dariusz Grzelecki, Chang Guohao, Dudy Arman Hanafy, Jonathan Hong, Susan Khalil, Bob Kiaii, Navamol Lekskul, Kil Yeon Lee, Shih-Hsuan Mao, Youn Young Park, Ji Won Park, Bhaveshkumar Patel, Luís Fernando Perin, Carlos Porras, Thiers Soares Raymundo, Christopher Reid, Rosa Jimenez-Rodriguez, Pablo Sanz-Ruiz, Nana Sarpong, Sharona Czerniak, Shahul Hameed Mohamed Siraj, M.J. Spencer, Santosh Thorat, Jonathan Torres-Castro, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Thomas Tsai, Francesco Venneri, Padmapriya Vivek, Mohamed Zayed
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Defunctioning stomas and the effect of oral antibiotic bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: a microbiome-based hypothesis
Jack Helliwell, Andrew Kirby, Caroline Chilton, Henry M. Wood, Philip Quirke, David Jayne
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
TPTh 8.09 3-Year Survival in Patients Aged ≥80 Years with Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Study of Operative and Non-Operative Management
Samantha Fairclough, Abdul Wahab Haider, Moussa Itani, Farah Khasawneh, Rana Kayyal, Rohit Makhija
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
TPT 6.11 From Paper to Digital Consent in Emergency General Surgery: Pilot Implementation Using Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Tracer
Panagiotis Kapsampelis, Ewan Maidment, Oliver Ng, Adam Peckham-Cooper, Ibrahim Rajput
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
SP 10.11 Does The 'Q' Word Make for the Best Hospitals?
Ken Adigwe, Rory Clarke, Ravi Vissapragada, Greta Mclachlan
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
EP 500 Evaluating the Experience of the General Surgical Team in Acute Kidney Injury Management
Isha Bashir, Emily Robinson, Jayan George, Matthew Wane, EeVone Lee, Simon Gonsalves
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
EP 523 Minimally Invasive Transanal Excision Techniques for Rectal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Audit
Santhosh Loganathan, Neha Hande, Raj Rao
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
TPT 7.19 Automated Analysis of Intraoperative Phase in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparison of One Consultant Surgeon and their Trainees
Gemma Humm, Adam Peckham-Cooper, Ayman Hamade, Christopher Wood, Khaled Dawas, Danail Stoyanov, Laurence Lovat
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
TPTh 2.01 Is Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy a Safe Training Procedure – A Single Centre Retrospective Study
A. Kapur, James Hughes, Benedict Blacket, Tabitha Gould, Phill Pearce, Giles Bond-Smith
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
EP 494 Can CT-Derived Skeletal Muscle Metrics Guide Treatment Decisions in Lavage Cytology–Positive Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Conversion Therapy?
Ping’An Ding, Peigang Yang, Li Yang, Chenyu Sun, Shuya Chen, Qun Zhao
10 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
47.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #182 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

47.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

88.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

6.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.