TPT 7.19 Automated Analysis of Intraoperative Phase in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparison of One Consultant Surgeon and their Trainees

Clicks: 4
ID: 324116
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract Background This study compares the intraoperative phase times in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a consultant surgeon and supervised trainees over 10-years to assess operative times as a marker of performance and any impact of case severity on times. Methods Laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos were uploaded to Touch Surgery™ Enterprise, a combined software and hardware solution for securely recording, storing, and analysing surgical videos, which provide analytics of intraoperative phase times. Case severity and visualisation of the critical view of safety (CVS) were manually assessed using modified 10-point intraoperative gallbladder scoring system (mG10) and CVS scores, respectively. Consultant and trainees’ times were compared unmatched and matched by mG10. Results 159 (consultant=96, trainee=63) laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos and intraoperative phase times were reviewed on Touch Surgery™ Enterprise and analysed. Consultant cases were more challenging (p=0.037). Trainees’ achieved higher CVS scores (p=0.034) and showed longer dissection of hepatocystic triangle (HCT) times (p=0.012) in more challenging cases. Trainees’ total operative time (p=0.001) and dissection of HCT (p=0.002) times exceeded the consultant’s in low-severity matched cases (mG10=1). Trainees’ total operative times (p<0.001), port insertion/gallbladder exposure (p=0.032), and dissection of HCT (p<0.001) exceeded the consultant’s in matched cases (mG10=2). Trainees’ total operative (p<0.001), dissection of HCT (p<0.001), and gallbladder dissection (p=0.010) times exceeded the consultants in unmatched cases. Conclusion Trainees’ total operative and dissection of HCT times significantly exceeded the consultant’s unmatched cases and low-severity matched cases which could suggest training need, however, also reflects an expected assessment of competence, and validates time as a marker of performance.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172516425 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Gemma Humm, Adam Peckham-Cooper, Ayman Hamade, Christopher Wood, Khaled Dawas, Danail Stoyanov, Laurence Lovat
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag087.258
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.