Indexed in Journament

abdominal radiology

ISSN 2366-004X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
21.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,648 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 2.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name abdominal radiology
ISSN 2366-004X

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 6.0
Community Impact 1.4
Content Distribution 56.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 6.0 24.1
Community Impact 1.4 4.2
Content Distribution 56.5 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2003
Preoperative assessment of pancreatic malignancy using endoscopic ultrasound
I. F. Yusoff;R. M. Mendelson;S. E. J. Edmunds;D. Ramsay;G. L. Cullingford;D. R. Fletcher;M. J. Zimmerman;I. F. Yusoff;R. M. Mendelson;S. E. J. Edmunds;D. Ramsay;G. L. Cullingford;D. R. Fletcher;M. J. Zimmerman;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0556-0562
480 views DOI Abstract
2003
Early invasive colorectal carcinomas with submucosal invasion: radiographic characteristics with barium double contrast images
G. Iinuma;N. Moriyama;K. Miyakawa;N. Yamamoto;T. Fujii;T. Shimoda;T. Ishikawa;K. Ushio;G. Iinuma;N. Moriyama;K. Miyakawa;N. Yamamoto;T. Fujii;T. Shimoda;T. Ishikawa;K. Ushio;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0492-0504
453 views DOI Abstract
2003
Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions using superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between ferumoxides-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and delayed-phase gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging
K. Takahama;Y. Amano;H. Hayashi;M. Ishihara;T. Kumazaki;K. Takahama;Y. Amano;H. Hayashi;M. Ishihara;T. Kumazaki;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0525-0530
429 views DOI Abstract
2003
Early esophageal carcinoma: endoscopic ultrasonography using the sonoprobe
T. Kawano;M. Ohshima;T. Iwai;T. Kawano;M. Ohshima;T. Iwai;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0477-0485
420 views DOI Abstract
2003
Common bile duct diameters after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with common bile duct stones: ultrasonographic evaluation
M. Karincaoglu;B. Yildirim;Y. Seckin;B. Kantarceken;M. Aladag;F. Hilmioglu;M. Karincaoglu;B. Yildirim;Y. Seckin;B. Kantarceken;M. Aladag;F. Hilmioglu;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0531-0535
384 views DOI Abstract
2003
CT virtual intravascular endoscopy of abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with suprarenal endovascular stent grafting
Z. Sun;R. J. Winder;B. E. Kelly;P. K. Ellis;D. G. Hirst;Z. Sun;R. J. Winder;B. E. Kelly;P. K. Ellis;D. G. Hirst;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0580-0587
373 views DOI Abstract
2003
Endolumenal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases
K. Yamao;K. Okubo;A. Sawaka;K. Hara;T. Nakamura;T. Suzuki;Y. Shimizu;I. Ozden;K. Yamao;K. Okubo;A. Sawaka;K. Hara;T. Nakamura;T. Suzuki;Y. Shimizu;I. Ozden;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0545-0555
373 views DOI Abstract
2003
Evaluation of the permeability of pancreaticogastric anastomoses (PGA) with dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation (secretin MRCP)
C. Aubé;J. Lebigot;P. Pessaux;J. J. Tuech;N. Kapel;P. Burtin;J. P. Arnaud;C. Caron;C. Aubé;J. Lebigot;P. Pessaux;J. J. Tuech;N. Kapel;P. Burtin;J. P. Arnaud;C. Caron;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0563-0570
341 views DOI Abstract
2003
Virtual CT cholangiography in patients with choledocholithiasis
P. Maniatis;C. Triantopoulou;E. Sofianou;I. Siafas;E. Psatha;C. Dervenis;E. Koulentianos;P. Maniatis;C. Triantopoulou;E. Sofianou;I. Siafas;E. Psatha;C. Dervenis;E. Koulentianos;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0536-0544
339 views DOI Abstract
2003
Early gastrointestinal cancers
M. Maruyama;M. Maruyama;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 0456-0463
310 views DOI
2020
Optimum imaging of chronic pancreatitis
G. A. Zamboni;M. C. Ambrosetti;M. Pezzullo;M. A. Bali;G. Mansueto;G. A. Zamboni;M. C. Ambrosetti;M. Pezzullo;M. A. Bali;G. Mansueto;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1410-1419
138 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced CT texture analysis to differentiate mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Shuai Ren;Rui Zhao;Jingjing Zhang;Kai Guo;Xiaoyu Gu;Shaofeng Duan;Zhongqiu Wang;Rong Chen;Shuai Ren;Rui Zhao;Jingjing Zhang;Kai Guo;Xiaoyu Gu;Shaofeng Duan;Zhongqiu Wang;Rong Chen;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1524-1533
188 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis in chronic pancreatitis: a feasibility and validation study
Jens Brøndum Frøkjær;Maria Valeryevna Lisitskaya;Alex Skovsbo Jørgensen;Lasse Riis Østergaard;Tine Maria Hansen;Asbjørn Mohr Drewes;Søren Schou Olesen;Jens Brøndum Frøkjær;Maria Valeryevna Lisitskaya;Alex Skovsbo Jørgensen;Lasse Riis Østergaard;Tine Maria Hansen;Asbjørn Mohr Drewes;Søren Schou Olesen;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1497-1506
231 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fat-modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) is a better predictor of severity and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis compared with modified CTSI
Pankaj Gupta;Saurabh Dawra;Karamvir Chandel;Jayanta Samanta;Harshal Mandavdhare;Vishal Sharma;Saroj Kant Sinha;Usha Dutta;Rakesh Kochhar;Pankaj Gupta;Saurabh Dawra;Karamvir Chandel;Jayanta Samanta;Harshal Mandavdhare;Vishal Sharma;Saroj Kant Sinha;Usha Dutta;Rakesh Kochhar;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1350-1358
106 views DOI Abstract
2020
Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study
Temel Tirkes;Zarine K. Shah;Naoki Takahashi;Joseph R. Grajo;Stephanie T. Chang;Ashley M. Wachsman;Kareem Mawad;Carlos A. Farinas;Liang Li;Savitri N. Appana;Darwin L. Conwell;Dhiraj Yadav;Anil K. Dasyam;Temel Tirkes;Zarine K. Shah;Naoki Takahashi;Joseph R. Grajo;Stephanie T. Chang;Ashley M. Wachsman;Kareem Mawad;Carlos A. Farinas;Liang Li;Savitri N. Appana;Darwin L. Conwell;Dhiraj Yadav;Anil K. Dasyam;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1481-1487
211 views DOI Abstract
2020
Systematic approach for assessment of imaging features in chronic pancreatitis: a feasibility and validation study from the Scandinavian Baltic Pancreatic Club (SBPC) database
Maria Valeryevna Lisitskaya;Søren Schou Olesen;Petra Svarc;Mohamed Ebrahim;Annette Bøjer Jensen;Camilla Nøjgaard;Peter Nørregaard;Asbjørn Mohr Drewes;Ingfrid S. Haldorsen;Trond Engjom;Jens Brøndum Frøkjær;Maria Valeryevna Lisitskaya;Søren Schou Olesen;Petra Svarc;Mohamed Ebrahim;Annette Bøjer Jensen;Camilla Nøjgaard;Peter Nørregaard;Asbjørn Mohr Drewes;Ingfrid S. Haldorsen;Trond Engjom;Jens Brøndum Frøkjær;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1468-1480
242 views DOI Abstract
2020
Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with acute pancreatitis: an audit from a tertiary care referral hospital
Pankaj Gupta;Rishabh Jain;Suzanne Koshi;Ajay Gulati;Jayanta Samanta;Harshal Mandavdhare;Vishal Sharma;Saroj K. Sinha;Usha Dutta;Manavjit Singh Sandhu;Rakesh Kochhar;Pankaj Gupta;Rishabh Jain;Suzanne Koshi;Ajay Gulati;Jayanta Samanta;Harshal Mandavdhare;Vishal Sharma;Saroj K. Sinha;Usha Dutta;Manavjit Singh Sandhu;Rakesh Kochhar;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1517-1523
168 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reporting of acute pancreatitis by radiologists-time for a systematic change with structured reporting template
Aman Khurana;Leslie W Nelson;Charles B Myers;Fatih Akisik;Brooke R. Jeffrey;Frank H. Miller;Pardeep Mittal;Desiree Morgan;Koenraad Mortele;Peter Poullos;Dushyant Sahani;Kumar Sandrasegaran;Temel Tirkes;Atif Zaheer;Bhavik N. Patel;Aman Khurana;Leslie W Nelson;Charles B Myers;Fatih Akisik;Brooke R. Jeffrey;Frank H. Miller;Pardeep Mittal;Desiree Morgan;Koenraad Mortele;Peter Poullos;Dushyant Sahani;Kumar Sandrasegaran;Temel Tirkes;Atif Zaheer;Bhavik N. Patel;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1277-1289
195 views DOI Abstract
2020
Introduction to the special section on pancreatitis
Atif Zaheer;Atif Zaheer;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1221-1221
36 views DOI
2020
Impact of age on the diagnostic performance of pancreatic ductal diameters in detecting chronic pancreatitis
Jens Brøndum Frøkjær;Søren Schou Olesen;Asbjørn Mohr Drewes;David Collins;Fatih Akisik;Jordan Swensson;Jens Brøndum Frøkjær;Søren Schou Olesen;Asbjørn Mohr Drewes;David Collins;Fatih Akisik;Jordan Swensson;
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 1488-1494
192 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
21.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,648 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

21.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

6.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.