Preoperative assessment of pancreatic malignancy using endoscopic ultrasound
Clicks: 484
ID: 112825
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
68.9
/100
484 views
341 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #1 of 56 articles by views in abdominal radiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been regarded as the most accurate modality for locoregional staging of pancreatic malignancy. However, several recent studies have questioned this. The current study assessed the accuracy of EUS in determining preoperative resectability of pancreatic neoplasia. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients with pancreatic malignancy who had preoperative EUS and underwent surgery. EUS-predicted resectability was compared with surgical resectability. Where available, accuracies of vascular and nodal staging were also assessed. Results: Forty-five patients were identified (mean age = 60 years, age range = 36–79 years). All patients underwent surgical exploration; vascular staging was available in 32 cases and 17 cases underwent surgical resection. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS in determining unresectability were 66%, 100%, and 78% respectively. Overall EUS stage concurred with surgical stage in 56%, greater than surgical stage in 4%, and less than surgical stage in 40%. Vascular staging on EUS had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%. Accuracy of nodal staging was 71%. Conclusion: EUS had a high specificity for assessing unresectable pancreatic malignancy. This technique should be used to avoid unnecessary surgical exploration of incurable lesions. However, EUS had only a moderate sensitivity, and a proportion of patients staged preoperatively as having resectable disease will not be surgically resectable.
| Reference Key |
yusoff2003abdominalpreoperative
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | I. F. Yusoff;R. M. Mendelson;S. E. J. Edmunds;D. Ramsay;G. L. Cullingford;D. R. Fletcher;M. J. Zimmerman;I. F. Yusoff;R. M. Mendelson;S. E. J. Edmunds;D. Ramsay;G. L. Cullingford;D. R. Fletcher;M. J. Zimmerman; |
| Journal | abdominal radiology |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI |
doi:10.1007/s00261-002-0072-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.