Indexed in Journament

journal of synchrotron radiation

ISSN 1600-5775· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,066 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 89.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nome Abreviado j synchrotron radiat
Nome Abreviado j synchrotron radiat
ISSN 1600-5775
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-5775

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of synchrotron radiation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 85.2 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.5
Content Distribution 51.0 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

a didática de comênio: entre o método de ensino e a viva voz do professor
Vol. 28 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 256-276
469 views DOI Abstract
2020
IRIXS: a resonant inelastic X-ray scattering instrument dedicated to X-rays in the intermediate energy range.
Vol. 27 , No. Pt 2 , pp. 538-544
405 views DOI Abstract
2017
In operando quantitation of Li concentration for a commercial Li-ion rechargeable battery using high-energy X-ray Compton scattering.
Vol. 24 , No. Pt 5 , pp. 1006-1011
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
BioStruct-Africa: empowering Africa-based scientists through structural biology knowledge transfer and mentoring - recent advances and future perspectives.
Vol. 26 , No. Pt 5 , pp. 1843-1850
361 views DOI Abstract
2011
imaginação: arte e ciência na infância imagination: arts and sciences in childhood
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 72-92
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hard and soft X-ray imaging to resolve human ovarian cortical structures.
Vol. 26 , No. Pt 4 , pp. 1322-1329
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coherent Bragg imaging of 60 nm Au nanoparticles under electrochemical control at the NanoMAX beamline.
Vol. 26 , No. Pt 5 , pp. 1830-1834
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
A portable on-axis laser-heating system for near-90° X-ray spectroscopy: application to ferropericlase and iron silicide.
Vol. 27 , No. Pt 2 , pp. 414-424
251 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tomographic reconstruction with a generative adversarial network.
Vol. 27 , No. Pt 2 , pp. 486-493
239 views DOI Abstract
2020
IRIXS: a resonant inelastic X-ray scattering instrument dedicated to X-rays in the intermediate energy range.
Vol. 27 , No. Pt 2 , pp. 538-544
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hard and soft X-ray imaging to resolve human ovarian cortical structures.
Vol. 26 , No. Pt 4 , pp. 1322-1329
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coherent Bragg imaging of 60 nm Au nanoparticles under electrochemical control at the NanoMAX beamline.
Vol. 26 , No. Pt 5 , pp. 1830-1834
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
BioStruct-Africa: empowering Africa-based scientists through structural biology knowledge transfer and mentoring - recent advances and future perspectives.
Vol. 26 , No. Pt 5 , pp. 1843-1850
361 views DOI Abstract
2018
PETRA IV: the ultralow-emittance source project at DESY
Vol. 25 , pp. 1277-1290
190 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,066 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

85.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

51.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.