Indexed in Journament

Applied Physics Letters

ISSN 0003-6951· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,544 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 81% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Applied Physics Letters
Abbreviated Name applied physics letters
ISSN 0003-6951
URL http://apl.aip.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Applied Physics Letters
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 38.9 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 63.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2014
virulence markers of vancomycin resistant enterococci isolated from infected and colonized patients
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 157-163
425 views DOI Abstract
2003
Enhancement of Mn luminescence in ZnS:Mn multi-quantum-well structures
Vol. 83 , pp. 4616-4618
372 views DOI
2010
multidrug resistant acinetobacter
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 291-304
355 views DOI Abstract
2002
Luminescence enhancement of core-shell ZnS:Mn/ZnS nanoparticles
Vol. 80 , pp. 4300-4302
314 views DOI
2015
risk correlates of diarrhea in children under 5 years of age in slums of bankura, west bengal
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 23-29
302 views DOI Abstract
1999
Nonlinear inductive response of high temperature superconducting films measured by the mutual inductance technique
Vol. 74 , No. 26 , pp. 4023-4025
299 views DOI Abstract
2010
cephalosporin resistance in neisseria gonorrhoeae
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 284-290
272 views DOI Abstract
2013
multiplex pcr for rapid diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 49-53
271 views DOI Abstract
2024
Tunable topological domain structures in high-density PbTiO3 nanodots array
Vol. 124 , No. 2
68 views DOI
2019
Antiferromagnetic NiO thickness dependent sign of the spin Hall magnetoresistance in γ-Fe2O3/NiO/Pt epitaxial stacks
Vol. 114 , No. 10 , pp. 102405-
178 views DOI
2018
pulmonary nocardiosis and scrub typhus in an immunocompromised host
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 108-111
255 views DOI Abstract
2017
strongyloides stercoralis infection: a case series from a tertiary care center in india
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 86-87
101 views DOI
2016
diagnostic accuracy of xpert test in tuberculosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 32-40
154 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,544 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.